ONTD

4:25 pm - 02/02/2011

Why Won't NBC's The Biggest Loser Let Its Gay Trainers Come Out?


Jillian Michaels is no longer training heavies for NBC's The Biggest Loser, but with a accusations of being a fraud and a burgeoning personal fitness empire, she's definitely a newsworthy lass. And like her now-former reality TV training pal Bob Harper, she's not straight. (Bi supposedly, but we've heard there aren't many romantic men in her life.) But how come she won't sit down with the LGBT press?

Last year she told Ladies' Home Journal, "If I fall in love with a woman, that's awesome. If I fall in love with a man, that's awesome. As long as you fall in love…it's like organic food. I only eat healthy food, and I only want healthy love!" And while I can't find an interview with Harper, he's a known L.A. gay. (He named his dog Karl, after Lagerfeld, for christ's sakes.)

But in trying to squeeze in some times with Michaels, the lesbian entertainment site AfterEllen was rebuffed. NBC's The Biggest Loser machine, now responsible for generating huge revenues for the network, also refused to let the website interview the show's new female trainer Cara Castronuova — also a lesbian.

Which is too bad, because given gays are biologically more inclined to care about health and fitness, The Biggest Loser is a show we love. (We love it for its pornographic privacy violations, too.) We know the show is powered by members of our own. And yet, we're being told we can't claim them. NBC has its own reasons for doling out access to the personalities behind its hit show. But letting them pop up on the covers of health magazines, but refusing queer sites, sends a very clear message.

SOURCE

Ugh, it's not like they are hurting anybody by being gay. Why so serious, NBC?
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
dorkii_rawk 2nd-Feb-2011 09:49 pm (UTC)
"We love it for its pornographic privacy violations"

ummm what?
penny_love_lane 2nd-Feb-2011 10:07 pm (UTC)
They're saying that it's such an invasion of privacy, it's pornographic.
duchello 2nd-Feb-2011 09:50 pm (UTC)
But what does them being gay have to with their job/the show? I don't think it's fair to force them to talk about their sexual orientation to anyone as long as they are happy.
duchello 2nd-Feb-2011 09:53 pm (UTC)
oh boy this is going to get misconstrued, what I mean is just that yes if they are gay they shouldn't be discriminated against but in terms of talking about it in the media I don't think being gay has to be the centerpiece of every conversation.
xtinkerbellax 2nd-Feb-2011 10:03 pm (UTC)
I get what your saying, I mean, the viewer gets a glimpse into the contestants personal lives, but there is really no reason to showcase the lives of the trainers.
dandi_brandi86 2nd-Feb-2011 10:11 pm (UTC)
mte. its not releavent to the show. And whose to say their in the closet?!? just cause they haven't come out to a magazine or in a sitdown interview doesn't mean their hiding something.
shadyoutkast 2nd-Feb-2011 09:50 pm (UTC)
(He named his dog Karl, after Lagerfeld, for christ's sakes.)

or he could be a big commie and named the dog after karl marx.
this_repetition 2nd-Feb-2011 10:00 pm (UTC)
That would be awesome.
duchello 2nd-Feb-2011 09:51 pm (UTC)
"And while I can't find an interview with Harper, he's a known L.A. gay. (He named his dog Karl, after Lagerfeld, for christ's sakes.)"

This is stupid.
celebratty 2nd-Feb-2011 09:53 pm (UTC)
Mte.
gaga 2nd-Feb-2011 09:54 pm (UTC)
very.
hingisova 2nd-Feb-2011 11:07 pm (UTC)
it's queerty.
jupitermoon 2nd-Feb-2011 09:51 pm (UTC)
"gays are biologically more inclined to care about health and fitness" - I guess I should give the memo to a couple of "gays" I know.
omg_its_drj 2nd-Feb-2011 09:53 pm (UTC)
you should. there is nothing worst that being fat in the gay community, unless youre a dyke.
jupitermoon 2nd-Feb-2011 09:55 pm (UTC)
True. True.
slightlyywicked 2nd-Feb-2011 10:02 pm (UTC)
lol what?

where Im from,fat dykes are not well liked.
a_model_citizen 2nd-Feb-2011 10:18 pm (UTC)
Weirdly, I am a fat, hetero female and I get hit on by girls quite a bit. I never understand it cause I'm not even remotely butch.
somefantastic 2nd-Feb-2011 10:32 pm (UTC)
Hello, bears.
pink_dog 2nd-Feb-2011 10:18 pm (UTC)
I was about to post this same excerpt with a big ol' WTF after it. Seriously, WTF? What is wrong with this writer?
lovepollution 2nd-Feb-2011 09:51 pm (UTC)
But how come she won't sit down with the LGBT press?

Maybe because it shouldn't matter and they don't need a big coming out in the press? You don't see anyone on the cover of People exclaiming "I'm straight!" so I don't see why being gay or bi should be treated any differently, it is what it is. Yes the media generally just assumes everyone is straight, but that's their problem, no one should be forced to clarify anything one way or the other.
celebratty 2nd-Feb-2011 10:01 pm (UTC)
LGBT press doesn't equal People magazine though... And that's totally different anyway. Straight people don't come out.

xtinkerbellax 2nd-Feb-2011 10:04 pm (UTC)
lol.
aliminx 2nd-Feb-2011 09:53 pm (UTC)
Not every fucking gay person in the world has to be an advocate for gay rights.
celebratty 2nd-Feb-2011 09:54 pm (UTC)
Just because someone is out doesn't automatically make them an advocate. o.o
aliminx 2nd-Feb-2011 10:02 pm (UTC)
Why do they have to be out? I'm sure they're out to people they're close to, and it sounds like Jillian Michaels has all but admitted to being at least bisexual, so what's the big deal? Because they wouldn't come out, officially, on a web site? Being an advocate is exactly what we're talking about here.
wonderwomanhero 2nd-Feb-2011 09:55 pm (UTC)
^ this so much
grlfrinly 2nd-Feb-2011 10:00 pm (UTC)
thank you.
on_my_raider 2nd-Feb-2011 10:07 pm (UTC)
IA. I don't know what annoys me more - the anti-gay hype and ignorance or the seemingly necessary announcement people must make. Sure it may help to have more advocates but wtf, enough with this magazine-cover-announcement-or-it-doesn't-count logic.
ppeak 2nd-Feb-2011 10:49 pm (UTC)
What does that have to do with the article?
riookierin 2nd-Feb-2011 09:53 pm (UTC)
(He named his dog Karl, after Lagerfeld, for christ's sakes.)

OH MY GOD. THIS SCREAMS HOMOSEXUAL.
wonderwomanhero 2nd-Feb-2011 09:54 pm (UTC)
It's almost like Queerty isn't trying hard enough not to be douchebags....
gaga 2nd-Feb-2011 09:53 pm (UTC)
what does them being gay have to do with helping fat people lose weight? its not that type of reality show...
celebratty 2nd-Feb-2011 09:55 pm (UTC)
This article and the writer are both dumb as hell.
pink_dog 2nd-Feb-2011 10:20 pm (UTC)
I completely agree. Maybe writers like this are why Bob and Jillian don't feel like sitting for interviews about their sex lives.
ppeak 2nd-Feb-2011 10:53 pm (UTC)
The gay press had no intention of basing an interview about their sex lives. The gay press just wanted the trainers to talk to them.

And Jillian already talked about her sex life and what she would be comfortable with, so what's the problem now?
theantipoet 2nd-Feb-2011 09:55 pm (UTC)

Which is too bad, because given gays are biologically more inclined to care about health and fitness


wait, what?
goldnchild87 2nd-Feb-2011 10:20 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I'm seriously sitting here scratching my head about this "fact".
brazenflight 2nd-Feb-2011 11:42 pm (UTC)
Ikr most of the lesbians I know are fat, brb passing the message along to them that they're not real gays
portmanteaux 3rd-Feb-2011 03:51 am (UTC)
Well, the article is from Queerty, where they mostly forget lesbians exist. I'm not surprised.
this_repetition 2nd-Feb-2011 09:56 pm (UTC)
They aren't really in the closet or have to pretend to have opposite-sex spouses, though. The latter would be incredibly insulting.
omg_its_drj 2nd-Feb-2011 09:57 pm (UTC)
lol *~*bisexual*~*
adamant_poetry 2nd-Feb-2011 09:58 pm (UTC)
Why the *~*~*?
omg_its_drj 2nd-Feb-2011 10:02 pm (UTC)
i think we both know why
perfiction 2nd-Feb-2011 10:26 pm (UTC)
troll harder.
cab 2nd-Feb-2011 10:00 pm (UTC)
this article is dumb as hell
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 12:53 pm GMT.