ONTD

8:53 pm - 02/01/2011

Christoph Waltz Looking GQ in ... GQ

Do Yourself a Solid

Who says you have to stick with the standard dark-suit-and-white-shirt combination? Here, Christoph Waltz, the Inglourious Basterd—and the new villain of The Green Hornet—explores L.A.'s most dynamic museum and shows you the most artful way to mix your solids

Photographs by Nathaniel Goldberg















Source.

He's so freaking handsome and suave.
I would. Forever and ever. Amen.
Page 1 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>
larastone 2nd-Feb-2011 02:06 am (UTC)
Something's a bit off.
sagacious_twit 2nd-Feb-2011 02:08 am (UTC)
What is?
larastone 2nd-Feb-2011 02:10 am (UTC)
I'm not sure, just the background and overabundant photoshopping combo is making me go "something's wrong here..."
anna_salem 2nd-Feb-2011 02:09 am (UTC)
He lost some weight. And photoshop.

But he still looks FLAWLESS.
tiffsta31 2nd-Feb-2011 03:02 am (UTC)
his head looks huge!
guadalcanal 2nd-Feb-2011 02:07 am (UTC)
He knows how to wear a suit
srsmoonlight 2nd-Feb-2011 02:07 am (UTC)
HOW IS HE SO FUCKING HOT.
americnxidiot 2nd-Feb-2011 02:10 am (UTC)
i have that thought whenever i see him, but he is!
theonlykow 2nd-Feb-2011 02:11 am (UTC)
I know, right? It's unfair how gorgeous he is.
rpduckie19 2nd-Feb-2011 02:13 am (UTC)
SRSLY.
serey05 2nd-Feb-2011 02:30 am (UTC)
I starting to feel that big font is inappropriate especially when scrolling past I don't like people seeing 'fuck' around me.


srsmoonlight 2nd-Feb-2011 02:47 am (UTC)
This reminds me of the ~no porn rule. D:
ohsookie 2nd-Feb-2011 03:49 am (UTC)
I starting to feel that typos are really offensive for me to read. I think we should ban them.
rewritten_since 2nd-Feb-2011 02:42 am (UTC)
it's a little bit disconcerting tbh
champagnexdream 2nd-Feb-2011 02:52 am (UTC)
This.
_keng_ 2nd-Feb-2011 03:06 am (UTC)
ughhhhhh ikr
_amateur 2nd-Feb-2011 03:12 am (UTC)
MMMmmmMMMmmmMMM
daianara 2nd-Feb-2011 02:07 am (UTC)
werq~ omfg he looks so fucking handsome :') shaking and crying
minderbinder 2nd-Feb-2011 02:08 am (UTC)
He is so handsome and suave.
zooeybellucci 2nd-Feb-2011 02:24 am (UTC)
I agree.
flirflir 2nd-Feb-2011 03:19 am (UTC)
mte
karinette001 2nd-Feb-2011 02:08 am (UTC)
WERQUE O M G
bob_always_wins 2nd-Feb-2011 02:08 am (UTC)
I love him.
stupidrichkids 2nd-Feb-2011 02:08 am (UTC)
There are so many nobodies with their own tags. Lol...
anna_salem 2nd-Feb-2011 02:10 am (UTC)
Umm. He's an Oscar winning actor with some high-profile roles coming this year.

So in response all I have to say is: NO U.
yeahwell_britt 2nd-Feb-2011 02:10 am (UTC)
Nobody?


...gtfo this post like now.
srsmoonlight 2nd-Feb-2011 02:11 am (UTC)
Stop
parisdiorchanel 2nd-Feb-2011 02:11 am (UTC)
ikr. It's annoying that someone as basic as Ashley Greene and Olivia Munn have tags, but Nina Dobrev doesn't. Nina Dobrev is actually relevant!

I do like Christoph Waltz though. He deserves a tag.

Edited at 2011-02-02 02:12 am (UTC)
enid_keaner 2nd-Feb-2011 02:32 am (UTC)
Who's Nina Dobrev?
minderbinder 2nd-Feb-2011 02:12 am (UTC)
You're just bitter because Jared Padalecki doesn't have one.
vettus 2nd-Feb-2011 02:41 am (UTC)
guadalcanal 2nd-Feb-2011 02:51 am (UTC)
champagnexdream 2nd-Feb-2011 02:53 am (UTC)
Lol OK Oscar winners are nobodies now, GTFO.
hateistoodark 2nd-Feb-2011 04:15 am (UTC)
lol he's an oscar winning actor stop
ohtheglorious 2nd-Feb-2011 02:08 am (UTC)
So sexy.
lovesetfire 2nd-Feb-2011 02:08 am (UTC)
He's old enough to be my dad, DON'T CURR
bitchsdangerous 2nd-Feb-2011 05:57 am (UTC)
Who gives a fuck, the man is sexy perfection!
hollymarchosias 2nd-Feb-2011 02:09 am (UTC)
Better than that Pettyfer post by far.
pshando 2nd-Feb-2011 02:09 am (UTC)
he is so adorable
sayanythinglove 2nd-Feb-2011 02:09 am (UTC)
GUESS WHO HAS A NEW BACKGROUND FOR THEIR COMPUTER NOW?
we_rob_banks 2nd-Feb-2011 03:48 am (UTC)
ME.
ohsookie 2nd-Feb-2011 03:50 am (UTC)
NO I REFUSE
yeahwell_britt 2nd-Feb-2011 02:09 am (UTC)
I feel like he hasn't been around since last year's oscar season.

His hotness needs to be present at all times.
thelovehater 2nd-Feb-2011 02:09 am (UTC)
I have this theory that about 45% of GQ's sales are fangirls and/or young women in search of actor fap material.
theonlykow 2nd-Feb-2011 02:12 am (UTC)
That's what the internet is for.

Besides, I bet GQ's gay male subscriber base is just as big as the women, haha.
aprilfunk 2nd-Feb-2011 02:33 am (UTC)
MTE
croutonochrist 2nd-Feb-2011 02:37 am (UTC)
I totally buy GQs and Esquires for the fap material.

Of course, I also buy them because they have a lot of really good articles. Particularly Esquire, because Chuck Klosterman writes for them. Why can't womens magazines have cool shit like that?
thelovehater 2nd-Feb-2011 02:38 am (UTC)
Because if we learn to read we might find our way out of the kitchen.
we_rob_banks 2nd-Feb-2011 03:47 am (UTC)
True story. I am buying GQ for these pics, ngl.
Page 1 of 7
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] >>
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 8:46 am GMT.