ONTD

4:07 pm - 03/03/2010

Dennis Lehane on Shutter Island's ending (~SPOILERS~)



Martin Scorsese's latest has a whopper of a conclusion. It's almost a note-perfect adaptation of Dennis Lehane's book. "Almost" because there's one comment made at the end which throws the entire house of cards constructed by the author into question. Lehane already told us that he stays out of the writing process once an agreement has been made to adapt one of his books. But he did share his thoughts on the slightly altered ending seen in the film.

SPOILER WARNING: "Shutter Island" concludes with the revelation that Leonardo DiCaprio's U.S. Marshal Teddy Daniels is in fact an alternate persona constructed by former U.S. Marshal and current Shutter Island inmate Andrew Laeddis. The entire investigation that unfolds over the course of the story was in fact an elaborate ruse designed to rattle Laeddis so much that he puts his Daniels persona to rest.

In this book, there's no question about how the ending plays out. Laeddis, seemingly on the road to recovery after his shocking ordeal, goes to sleep. He wakes up and meets with his doctor, who had been playing the role of his partner for the "case," outside the main facility. As the two sit there, it becomes clear that Laeddis has once again lapsed into his Daniels persona, essentially sentencing himself to a lobotomy.

The film is more ambiguous. Things play out similarly, but as Laeddis/Daniels sits and has a smoke with his doctor/partner, he asks the question "Would you rather live as a monster or die as a hero?" This raises the possibility that his relapse is in fact intentional, that Laeddis is so tired of being sick, he longs for the blissful ignorance that a lobotomy will bring.

We asked Lehane for his thoughts on the altered ending in an interview last week. "I would say that line, which comes across as a question, he asks it sort of rhetorically," he explained. "Personally, I think he has a momentary flash. To me that's all it is. It's just one moment of sanity mixed in the midst of all the other delusions."

"When he asks the question, he does it in such a way that, if he were to say it as a statement... then there's no solution here but to stop the lobotomy. Because if he shows any sort of self-awareness, then it's over, they wouldn't want to lobotomize him. My feeling was no, he's not so conscious he says 'Oh I'm going to decide to pretend to be Laeddis so they'll finally give me a lobotomy.' That would just be far more suicidal than I think this character is. I think that in one moment, for a half a second sitting there in that island he remembered who he was and then he asks that question and he quickly sort of lets it go. That was my feeling on that line."

That's about as detailed an explanation as a fan could hope for. It's also a sensible read, even if you don't agree with the decision to make the change. Lehane was and is okay with it though.

"I liked that line when I read the script," he said. "There was just some debate as to how much of a question it is and how much of a declarative statement. In the end they went with it being a question, which I think is important."

I read the book first, so I didn't think it was intentional; I thought he just genuinely relapsed. But it was an interesting moment in the film, and I liked the way Leo played it. What do you think, ONTD?
source
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
fisher55 3rd-Mar-2010 09:46 pm (UTC)
the gay anal-sex scene at the end was such a shock!
bapestar 3rd-Mar-2010 09:47 pm (UTC)
lmfao
schmiss 3rd-Mar-2010 09:47 pm (UTC)
lmao for real though, before I saw it someone said it should be called Shutter Bi-Land and I was like umm, I'm sure if there was a DiCaprio/Ruffalo sex scene I woulda known about it

of course they meant bi-polar but eh
apres_ 3rd-Mar-2010 11:33 pm (UTC)
this is when I wish lj had a like button.
random00 4th-Mar-2010 12:25 am (UTC)
Photobucket
lovelyeli 3rd-Mar-2010 09:50 pm (UTC)
rofllll
luvthatdrtywata 3rd-Mar-2010 09:52 pm (UTC)
not as much of a shock as the ritualistic burning of the goat herd!
naveedchick 3rd-Mar-2010 09:47 pm (UTC)
I enjoyed this movie :)
perfect_bones01 3rd-Mar-2010 11:40 pm (UTC)
ikr? and I totally thought in the end he was pretending so he would get the lobotomy and not be sick anymore. idgaf what the author says, he's just bitter that they changed his ending. imo the movie ending was better and more believable.
noevoe978 4th-Mar-2010 05:23 am (UTC)
Really? I'd say him staying crazy after being severely crazy (especially since he'd relapsed before) is more believable than him just magically being better.
dottiepalooza 3rd-Mar-2010 09:48 pm (UTC)
I KNEW this is what the whole thing was about. Twist ending my ass.
minimaggie 3rd-Mar-2010 11:33 pm (UTC)
yeah i called it in the first 5 minutes.
toaerythinness 4th-Mar-2010 02:50 am (UTC)
me too
alphabeter IDENTITY was better4th-Mar-2010 06:25 pm (UTC)
Plus it had pretty John Cusack, not sad sack doing it for the money puffy Cusack (like the hot tub time travel movie).

Puffy Leo trying to be serious does nothing for me.
duchello 3rd-Mar-2010 09:49 pm (UTC)
I didn't think the movie was spectacular, and if I hadn't seen "The Others" the ending would have really gotten me but I did love the filming and the acting.
apres_ 3rd-Mar-2010 11:37 pm (UTC)
yeah I enjoyed it but the ending was too obvious. I was like goddamnit bruce willis, you're fucking dead!!!!
my_whyte_noise 4th-Mar-2010 01:13 am (UTC)
You mean Nicole Kidman?
luvthatdrtywata 3rd-Mar-2010 09:51 pm (UTC)
I am glad I read this, I have been contemplating whether or not to spoil the ending but I needed to. These types of movies always confused the shit out of me. I catch things in movies that no one else does, I'll pick up on why they used a certain color or shape or light reflection but these type of twist-ending, unresolved type of movies always confuse me.
tin_o_biscuits 3rd-Mar-2010 10:10 pm (UTC)
I'll pick up on why they used a certain color or shape or light reflection
LOL I do that too. I'll point out how a scene is set up ("look, see how the shadow makes it look like they're in comic book panels?") and colour cues and all that jazz. XD
trappedinabox2 3rd-Mar-2010 11:44 pm (UTC)
YES THANK YOU honestly i felt like i was thinking into it way too hard
pdebevoise 3rd-Mar-2010 09:52 pm (UTC)
I saw this last night and loved it.
lovelyeli 3rd-Mar-2010 09:52 pm (UTC)
i loved this movie SFM

it was really beautiful too
and leo was A+ in it
eyeninetyfive 3rd-Mar-2010 09:53 pm (UTC)
ia
eomir 3rd-Mar-2010 10:11 pm (UTC)
It's so nice to hear someone else call it beautiful. Everyone I know keeps saying it was all creepy and slow and I thought it was lovely and interesting and very old school filming. Leo was excellent in it.
elisabet85 3rd-Mar-2010 11:13 pm (UTC)
same
dontknockswayze 3rd-Mar-2010 09:53 pm (UTC)
i read the book before i saw the movie and i thought both were great.

leo's acting was AMAZING. especially the whole lake scene...wow. that really disturbed me.
crazyspaced 3rd-Mar-2010 09:55 pm (UTC)
I saw this movie yesterday and loved it! Leo was amazing in it. Despite what this article, I think the whole ending of the movie was meant to be ambiguous and gives the viewer the choice to decide how they thought the movie ended. I personally think, in regards to the movie, Leo's character didn't relapse and he chose his fate, because he just couldn't live with what he'd done.
ontdownsme 3rd-Mar-2010 09:57 pm (UTC)
i think i was anticipating this movie too much because when i saw it i was severely disappointed.

i guess i just thought scorsese would really elevate the genre, but it seemed run of the mill.
vivisexion 3rd-Mar-2010 10:00 pm (UTC)
ita. i thought the movie was boring and the "twist ending" was v. predictable
fusilli_head 3rd-Mar-2010 11:08 pm (UTC)
ugh, I totally agree. And I wasn't even anticipating the film a whole lot. I went to see it on a whim and I knew there was a twist going into it and I already figured what it was before it happened.

I feel like this movie will be best on second viewings because then all the weird stuff at the beginning will make more sense. I found myself going back over the film in my mind after it was over and picking up on stuff like the fact that they coached the patients. I really liked the fact that there wasn't the ending montage that clipped together all the stuff you should have noticed to see the twist coming. I was still disappointed although I'm not sure what I expected exactly.
tin_o_biscuits 3rd-Mar-2010 10:08 pm (UTC)
My sibling and I had it figured out when the trailers came out. But we still enjoyed how it unfolded.
suave_badass 3rd-Mar-2010 11:15 pm (UTC)
Same.
synflood 3rd-Mar-2010 09:58 pm (UTC)
insane or sane?
alphabeter Insane in the Membrane...4th-Mar-2010 06:26 pm (UTC)
Insane in the brain
treradical 3rd-Mar-2010 09:59 pm (UTC)
i kinda want to see this but omfg i get scared way too easily

brb wiki'ing all about it
fusilli_head 3rd-Mar-2010 11:09 pm (UTC)
there's nothing scary about it. Maybe a bit disturbing but it's not gory and there are no jump scares.
alanadelrey Dear OP:3rd-Mar-2010 10:00 pm (UTC)
THANK YOU FOR THIS POST. I have been arguing about this with my friends since the movie came out, haha.
I read the book first, and I actually thought it wasn't that clear that he relapsed.. but maybe that was just because I really, really didn't want him to be insane :P
devon_carrots 3rd-Mar-2010 10:01 pm (UTC)
I am confusedddddddddddd
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 2:50 am GMT.