3:26 pm - 02/24/2010
Craig Ferguson last night: no audience, one guest, a great hour of TV
Craig Ferguson had no studio audience last night, and only one guest: actor-writer-comedian-polymath Stephen Fry. They just talked. It was one of the best hours of TV I’ve seen in a while. It was also a crucial Late Late Show at a crucial time, just before the late-night wars begin once again.
Ferguson commenced the show by explaining that the “terrible thing unfolding on NBC” had driven him to think anew about the late-night traditions started by Steve Allen, Jack Paar, Johnny Carson, and “lovingly deconstructed” by David Letterman. And one of the inspirations for this one-on-one chat with Fry was a predecessor in the 12:35 time period, the late, “cranky, wonderful” Tom Snyder and his Tomorrow Show
One result of this re-thinking was last night’s “experiment”: Nothing new, Ferguson hastened to point out, but — well, yes, new enough. He and Fry wondered whether “it’s possible to talk to someone without people whooping in the background.” It certainly was.
Fry is a wonderful talker, of course. He and Ferguson discussed Hugh Laurie (he and Fry were a much-loved comic duo, Fry and Laurie, in the 1980s and early ’90s), Jersey Shore (“I’d like to have abdominal muscles like that,” said Craig) the punk rock scene in 1970s London (one of the 52 year-old Fry’s formative experiences), Zac Efron (“very beautiful and very talented,” remarked the eternally open-minded Ferguson), and Twitter (Fry is an avid, prolific “early adopter,” as he put it, and remember you can follow you-know-who #CraigyFerg).
They talked about Fry’s cocaine use, Craig’s alcohol use, and the uselessness of getting older. “I doubt I would recognize Lady Gaga if she walked into a room unless she had a wedding cake on her head,” admitted Fry. “I feel like a fogey,” said Ferguson, “but the best way to [combat] that is not to talk about how good things used to be, but appreciate what’s new.”
What was new last night was this old-fashioned hour, in which two people conversed in an enlightening, deceptively casual way. It was terrific to see two pros like this.
PART 1
PART 2
PART 3
PART 4
PART 5
Of last nights show Craig has said on Twitter "Odd show. Some will like it. Some won't" So what do you guys think of the format change? Imo it worked, but only for a guest like Stephen Fry (i'm biased of course since i'm completely and utterly in love with Mr Fry)
VIDEO SOURCE
NEWS ARTICAL
Ferguson commenced the show by explaining that the “terrible thing unfolding on NBC” had driven him to think anew about the late-night traditions started by Steve Allen, Jack Paar, Johnny Carson, and “lovingly deconstructed” by David Letterman. And one of the inspirations for this one-on-one chat with Fry was a predecessor in the 12:35 time period, the late, “cranky, wonderful” Tom Snyder and his Tomorrow Show
One result of this re-thinking was last night’s “experiment”: Nothing new, Ferguson hastened to point out, but — well, yes, new enough. He and Fry wondered whether “it’s possible to talk to someone without people whooping in the background.” It certainly was.
Fry is a wonderful talker, of course. He and Ferguson discussed Hugh Laurie (he and Fry were a much-loved comic duo, Fry and Laurie, in the 1980s and early ’90s), Jersey Shore (“I’d like to have abdominal muscles like that,” said Craig) the punk rock scene in 1970s London (one of the 52 year-old Fry’s formative experiences), Zac Efron (“very beautiful and very talented,” remarked the eternally open-minded Ferguson), and Twitter (Fry is an avid, prolific “early adopter,” as he put it, and remember you can follow you-know-who #CraigyFerg).
They talked about Fry’s cocaine use, Craig’s alcohol use, and the uselessness of getting older. “I doubt I would recognize Lady Gaga if she walked into a room unless she had a wedding cake on her head,” admitted Fry. “I feel like a fogey,” said Ferguson, “but the best way to [combat] that is not to talk about how good things used to be, but appreciate what’s new.”
What was new last night was this old-fashioned hour, in which two people conversed in an enlightening, deceptively casual way. It was terrific to see two pros like this.
PART 1
PART 2
PART 3
PART 4
PART 5
Of last nights show Craig has said on Twitter "Odd show. Some will like it. Some won't" So what do you guys think of the format change? Imo it worked, but only for a guest like Stephen Fry (i'm biased of course since i'm completely and utterly in love with Mr Fry)
VIDEO SOURCE
NEWS ARTICAL
also, i just watched "stephen fry's america" a few weeks ago and loved it. i expected it to be a tad condescending, but it ended up being charming as hell.
but I never want him to become mainstream
still love them both.
IDK, I live in England where Late Night TV does not exist. I just know whenever I watch interviews with celebs I like on Late Night shows they all seem to last about 5 minutes and the host dominates the interview.
A whole hour might be a too much for the audience but interviews on US TV are too short. I guess that's good when you don't like the interviewee but when you love them it's painful
if James Lipton talked more about rehab, England, and cock.Thank you, thank you for posting these videos, so I can actually watch my favourite person talk to the most adorable host in the world. *blissful sigh* :)