ONTD

Street Fighter Elena [info]davejohn
2:55 am - 02/05/2010

Anne Hathaway on cover of GQ














She's so gorgeous, one just want to...

SOURCE
Page 1 of 12
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] >>
Leave a Comment
[info]pushpoplove 5th-Feb-2010 02:01 am (UTC)
Hot.
[info]hawaii_bombay 5th-Feb-2010 02:02 am (UTC)
That cover is awkward as hell.
[info]ecctv 5th-Feb-2010 02:02 am (UTC)
I think her nipples are right at the top of that top, if not shopped out.
[info]in_my_tree 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
That's what I thought too....someone stole her nipples.
[info]muzicnem 5th-Feb-2010 02:38 am (UTC)
THIS. I was like, "Something doesn't look right here...OH IT'S HER NIPPLES".
[info]marisela 5th-Feb-2010 04:14 am (UTC)
no, what happened was the cleavage was shopped in after the fact so it just looks askew, because it isn't actually natural.
[info]myfina 5th-Feb-2010 12:08 pm (UTC)
That's what I'm thinking.
[info]0sleep2dream0 5th-Feb-2010 03:52 am (UTC)
You mean other than the fact that someone is so thin that a corset (or corset-looking top) looks loose?
[info]r_e_ana 5th-Feb-2010 06:33 am (UTC)
mte -_-
[info]captain_hair_eh 5th-Feb-2010 06:47 am (UTC)
i think it's because of her pose.
her head looks way too big for her body in that position and angle.
[info]alexahhh 5th-Feb-2010 02:02 am (UTC)
hubba hubba!
[info]flumes 5th-Feb-2010 02:05 am (UTC)
honey baby is so sexy that he should win an oscah haaaa~
[info]alexahhh 5th-Feb-2010 02:14 am (UTC)
A+++
[info]x_falsetto 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
I like her a bit more after seeing her in Brokeback Mountain. I couldn't stand all those Princess movies. :/
[info]snapiphany 5th-Feb-2010 02:05 am (UTC)
My BFF was like, "OMG! I saw her tits in Brokeback!" and I was like, "Dude, you're gay: why is this exciting?"

That's my story, bro.
[info]puta_estupida 5th-Feb-2010 02:10 am (UTC)
Gay men love tits. Well that's been my experience with gay men and my tits.
[info]zygopetalum 5th-Feb-2010 09:54 am (UTC)
Because they're great tits.
Who doesn't appreciate a nice set of tatas, really?
[info]enid_keaner 5th-Feb-2010 02:16 am (UTC)
Same. It was nice to see her in something with some substance.
[info]yrsuchariot 5th-Feb-2010 02:37 am (UTC)
Have you seen Rachel Getting Married?
[info]timesvelocity 5th-Feb-2010 05:46 am (UTC)
you should watch the devil wears prada.
if aynthing, for Streep's and Blunt's awesome performances.
[info]socksandaphone 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
I love her idgaf
[info]stormyskies 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
I'm going to admit right now that the only reason I saw that movie more than once was to completely objectify Chris Pine.
[info]dothecrunge 5th-Feb-2010 02:09 am (UTC)
haha same
[info]baglady25 5th-Feb-2010 02:12 am (UTC)
I think that's why everybody saw it more than once.
[info]wits 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
she's very pretty, but what a terrible cover
[info]snapiphany 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
What would Jack Twist Jack Nasteh Queen Clarisse say?
[info]stormyskies 5th-Feb-2010 02:25 am (UTC)
Grandma Poppins got her goodies out in a few films, so I imagine not much.
[info]snapiphany 5th-Feb-2010 02:35 am (UTC)
Oh. So that's why they call her Poppins.
[info]iheartweasleys 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
STILL PRINCESS MIA. SRY.
[info]pandamore 5th-Feb-2010 02:14 am (UTC)
exactly
[info]flumes 5th-Feb-2010 02:03 am (UTC)
Weird cover but I love her.
[info]principino 5th-Feb-2010 02:04 am (UTC)
Anal Anne
[info]frenchverbs 5th-Feb-2010 02:31 am (UTC)
I just loled. I still remember that blind item.
[info]muzicnem 5th-Feb-2010 02:39 am (UTC)
I can't not think about this every time I see her now.
[info]fattygrl587 5th-Feb-2010 03:57 am (UTC)
same. She will always be Anal Anne in my book.
[info]akawhiplady 5th-Feb-2010 03:12 am (UTC)
MY MOM STILL CALLS HER THAT

I totally forgot about it and recently I said to my mom that something to the effect of "Oh, I heard Anne Hathaway was good in Rachel Getting Married," and my mom yells

"OH, ANAL ANNIE!"
[info]lovely_tunes 5th-Feb-2010 02:24 pm (UTC)
my first tought ngl
[info]vicarabelling 5th-Feb-2010 02:04 am (UTC)
She's pretty, but sometimes her facial features seem oversized. idk.
[info]dothecrunge 5th-Feb-2010 02:10 am (UTC)
i've always thought this. like she's the opposite of a frond
[info]redikolous 5th-Feb-2010 02:26 am (UTC)
A...frond?
[info]wintourseason 5th-Feb-2010 04:47 am (UTC)
lmao irl
[info]pottergirl26 5th-Feb-2010 05:31 am (UTC)
ITA
[info]pill 5th-Feb-2010 02:04 am (UTC)
gorgeous. but what exactly does she mean by "babe in the woods" she comes across as cocky sometimes
[info]me_and_jimmy 5th-Feb-2010 02:06 am (UTC)
I thought of Babe the pig LOL
[info]thebadunkadunk 5th-Feb-2010 02:25 am (UTC)
Lol GQ fails at pulling quotes. In the article she says "The producer who wanted me to get the part before I went before the network had to take my shopping because my clothes were so sad. I had no idea what image I had to project: a real babe in the woods."

IDK I guess it's like being a real knock-out hottie or whatever. I've always liked her but I appreciate the fact that she acknowledges that she used to be really cocky, it seems like she's matured
[info]amkf 5th-Feb-2010 02:33 am (UTC)
You're not even close, sorry to say. "Babe in the woods" is quite an old expression, predating the modern use of "babe" to designate an attractive woman. Babe = baby. She means that she was very naive/innocent/inexperienced.
[info]amkf 5th-Feb-2010 02:34 am (UTC)
"Babe in the woods" = a naive or innocent person; an inexperienced person.
[info]brothorsport 5th-Feb-2010 02:04 am (UTC)
my life changed when I saw her tits in Brokeback
[info]ta_tow 5th-Feb-2010 03:37 am (UTC)
Seriously, in a bad way.

I kinda liked those princess movies, and then she'd turn weird, and I'd imagine her topless.
D:
[info]ta_tow 5th-Feb-2010 03:38 am (UTC)
I mean, she'd turn at a weird angle.
[info]deerlike 5th-Feb-2010 04:47 am (UTC)
Changed for the good, I hope. :)
[info]xeroxicide__ 5th-Feb-2010 02:05 am (UTC)
These are really good photos
probably the best of hers I've ever seen
Page 1 of 12
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] >>
Leave a comment
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 3:55 pm GMT.