ONTD

8:05 pm - 01/04/2010

Not gonna lie...I'm jealous.

Australian model/tv personality Jennifer Hawkins (Miss Universe 2004) has appeared on the cover of Marie Claire (Australia, February 2010) naked and un-retouched to encourage positive attitudes to body image and support the Butterfly Foundation.





A foundation that helps women combat eating disorders has defended a naked, untouched magazine photo of supermodel Jennifer Hawkins, saying it promotes awareness of positive body image.

The 26-year-old wears only make-up on the cover of the February issue of Marie Claire, which supports the Butterfly Foundation. The organisation provides help to Australians suffering from eating disorders and negative body image issues and their carers.


Foundation general manager Julie Parker, speaking on Radio 3AW today, said the photo, which apparently shows 'flaws' including a slightly dimpled thigh and a tiny crease on her waist, was intended to get the discussion on body image rolling.

"What we're talking about here is just one small part of the much wider spectrum of body image, self esteem and eating disorder issues and that small part is actually about digital enhancement and retouching of images", Ms Parker said.

"It's so excessive in magazines these days and young girls and women are constantly telling us that they don't even know what they're looking at any more, and what they want to see is more real, untouched and natural photos of celebrities and people in magazines, and I think this delivers that".

In the magazine, which hits the stands this Wednesday, Hawkins says:"I'm not a stick figure - I thought it would be great to tell women to just be themselves and be confident."

When asked why the foundation did not put forward a more average Australian woman, Ms Parker said magazines had tried that tactic in the past, to no avail.

"The thing is unfortunately it doesn't make the same point, because Jennifer sells magazines and she creates awareness. If Marie Claire had chosen to put on their cover an ordinary women, say myself or a friend of yours, it would not have created the awareness it does".

Ms Parker said she hoped the shoot would help push magazines into including more natural images.

Wank will no doubt continue. Personally I think she looks great, but it doesn't help females who already have body image issues (ie most).

Source: Image Source: Text
Page 1 of 12
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] >>
[info]suzycat 4th-Jan-2010 10:28 am (UTC)
Yeah, though I can imagine exactly where changes would be made if that was a "normal" cover shot like removing the tiny creases and smoothing out her thighs and probably curving in her waist on her right hand side as well. Criminal.

I would love it if they had given the image to a bunch of photoretouchers with instructions to retouch and shown what the results were compared to her REAL body.
[info]williamblair 4th-Jan-2010 10:39 am (UTC)
It'd be great if they still released those photos. They may not have retouched her body but they certainly did everything else. She has lovely plastic skin.
[info]maveness 4th-Jan-2010 02:20 pm (UTC)
That's what gets me. For all that this girl has a perfect figure (based on modeling standards), they would still retouch the hell out of her.

Get Jamie Lee Curtis again and I'll show this idea some respect.
[info]roxtarrr 4th-Jan-2010 02:43 pm (UTC)
[info]102bb 4th-Jan-2010 10:08 am (UTC)
[info]tadaima_a_a 4th-Jan-2010 10:12 am (UTC)
dont eat much :)))
[info]filmfreakfranco 4th-Jan-2010 10:19 am (UTC)
LOOL
[info]williamblair 4th-Jan-2010 10:08 am (UTC)
Still looks photoshopped.
[info]bikinifetish 4th-Jan-2010 10:16 am (UTC)
IA.
[info]oneinamillian 4th-Jan-2010 04:00 pm (UTC)
came here to say that!

[info]xlovexlessxtyx 4th-Jan-2010 04:41 pm (UTC)
She is slighty.
[info]memento 4th-Jan-2010 10:08 am (UTC)
Wah wah Hawko, you're so brave for showing your .01 micrograms of fat.

MY SELF-ESTEEM IS TOTALLY BOOSTED BY THIS.
[info]memento 4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
And yes, I will wank whenever that smug bogan with a blog Mia Freedman is involved in anything (she's one of the organisers of this dumbfuck campaign).
[info]quellerette 4th-Jan-2010 10:11 am (UTC)
hahaha IKR
[info]pinkprincessnat 4th-Jan-2010 10:24 am (UTC)
ugh I can't stand Mia Freedman. I hate her column in the Sunday Age.
[info]electric_mole_x 4th-Jan-2010 10:43 am (UTC)
i love that you said bogan. ♥
[info]casi_casi 4th-Jan-2010 11:26 am (UTC)
Oh that woman is truly horrendous.
[info]flightsabove 4th-Jan-2010 11:37 am (UTC)
i thought i was the only one who hated that haughty bitch!
[info]gringotts 4th-Jan-2010 01:24 pm (UTC)
i cannot stand hawkins she's such a failure
[info]curls 4th-Jan-2010 03:50 pm (UTC)
I love your icon. I just watched P&P this weekend. :D
[info]102bb also4th-Jan-2010 10:09 am (UTC)
Foundation general manager Julie Parker, speaking on Radio 3AW today, said the photo, which apparently shows 'flaws' including a slightly dimpled thigh and a tiny crease on her waist, was intended to get the discussion on body image rolling

lmao
[info]memento Re: also4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
GOD WHAT A FUCKING FATTY AMIRITE
[info]102bb Re: also4th-Jan-2010 10:11 am (UTC)
is that lady being serious? i don't understand
[info]otherjoseph Re: also4th-Jan-2010 10:11 am (UTC)
IA, I almost feel made fun of.
[info]ultravlntmoloko Re: also4th-Jan-2010 10:14 am (UTC)
omfg when I read 'a tiny crease on her waist' I had a visceral reaction
[info]matchboxer Re: also4th-Jan-2010 04:46 pm (UTC)
lol oh ok
[info]prinzessin784 Re: also4th-Jan-2010 04:54 pm (UTC)
this. wtf.
[info]sporkgoddess Re: also4th-Jan-2010 06:04 pm (UTC)
The crease wouldn't even be there if she were in a different pose.
[info]wordsbreakeasy 4th-Jan-2010 10:09 am (UTC)
i'm sorry, the fact that there are women out there who look like this UNTOUCHED makes me feel WORSE about myself. a crease on her waist? shut up.
[info]tell_a_tale_4_u 4th-Jan-2010 11:24 am (UTC)
MTE.
[info]prinzessin784 4th-Jan-2010 04:55 pm (UTC)
IA
[info]celica18l 4th-Jan-2010 08:08 pm (UTC)
ah yes i hate all these bitches
[info]fractalerrors 4th-Jan-2010 10:09 am (UTC)
Go her!
[info]allopatric 4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
/cries in her cheerios
[info]indieheadphones 4th-Jan-2010 10:11 am (UTC)
lmao irl
[info]ireadyou_right 4th-Jan-2010 10:35 am (UTC)
lol irl
[info]rydee 4th-Jan-2010 11:29 am (UTC)
lol irl!
[info]lconic 4th-Jan-2010 12:01 pm (UTC)
OMG ICON!
Looooooove A Goofy Movie!
[info]nandayarou 4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
... I really didn't want to say this, but...

Her face is the problem here. She looks beautiful, but the way her hair frames her face in the main pic makes her face look sooo weird.

(Huh, turns out it didn't sound as bad as I thought it would.)
[info]sadakodona 4th-Jan-2010 11:39 am (UTC)
It's because they photoshopped the hell out of her face (it's just make-up, my ass) and left the rest of her body untouched. Naturally, it looks strange.
[info]tadaima_a_a 4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
cute one
i like her
[info]filmfreakfranco 4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
Aww idgaf, I love it!
[info]yellowno3 4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
What a fucking stupid idea.
[info]hazysea 4th-Jan-2010 10:16 am (UTC)
this.
[info]sadakodona 4th-Jan-2010 11:39 am (UTC)
IA
[info]schoolisuncool 4th-Jan-2010 04:48 pm (UTC)
ikr, seeing a skinny bitch naked is making me feel sooo much better about myself!
[info]quellerette 4th-Jan-2010 10:10 am (UTC)
oh good grief, give me a break!
[info]oh_atomic 4th-Jan-2010 10:11 am (UTC)
wow she sure is flawed! /sarcasm
[info]___showerscene 4th-Jan-2010 10:11 am (UTC)
Still photoshopped.
[info]kohaku_hime 4th-Jan-2010 05:51 pm (UTC)
yes she has a bony flat ass. so they contorted her around to make her look like she does.

HORSE FACE.

i dont understand why people still like her...
Page 1 of 12
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 10:56 pm GMT.