ONTD

3:09 am - 11/24/2009

YOU'VE BEEN PUNK'D: Demi Moore's Body Replaced By W Magazine



In a recent high profile row, Ralph Lauren took flack for blatant outrageous Photoshopping of models. But this has not reformed the industry. Instead, magazines like W have simply decided to jam more false images of how people look down our throats. After all, who is to stop them?

Check out what it appears to be 26 year old Anja Rubik's superimposed body... scratch that - her body was attached to Demi Moores for the sake of a better cover image. You have to wonder, did Demi even wear the same Balmain dress?

++++ S H O C K I N G ++++Collapse )

OH THIS IS GONNA BE GOOD

source
courtneyfrances 24th-Nov-2009 03:24 am (UTC)
jesus god, i keep scrolling back up to that model. so goddamn skinny. she looks like aeon flux (animated plz) with those hipbones all exposed.
velocityofsound 24th-Nov-2009 03:24 am (UTC)
That model is assnasty
captchasucks 24th-Nov-2009 03:25 am (UTC)
the way that model's hipbones jut out like that reminds me of how it looks like a brain is jutting out of the back of timbaland's skull:





...except it's not funny.
degele 24th-Nov-2009 03:26 am (UTC)
URGH ITS LIKE HE HAS CELLULITE ON THIS SCALP
holleratalex 24th-Nov-2009 03:27 am (UTC)
still looks like a face.
milkradio 24th-Nov-2009 07:25 am (UTC)
It's Voldemort!
roxi9 24th-Nov-2009 03:30 am (UTC)
D:
probot 24th-Nov-2009 03:31 am (UTC)
FUCK I AM EATING FUCK YOU
breadsandwiches 24th-Nov-2009 03:33 am (UTC)
JESUS CHRIST.

head fat creeps me the fuck out. asjkfldsjkfldsj
meangirl33 24th-Nov-2009 03:49 am (UTC)
Damnnnnnnn
redcurrantbasil 24th-Nov-2009 04:01 am (UTC)
That is so nasty
cemetrygates 24th-Nov-2009 04:07 am (UTC)
OMG that actually was Timbaland? LOL4LIFE.
shutterdragon 24th-Nov-2009 04:23 am (UTC)
omfg its like his brain is exploding out of his head! D:
underdog_ontop 24th-Nov-2009 04:31 am (UTC)
well obviously he his housing voldemort's disembodied form duuh.
luvherbones 24th-Nov-2009 04:35 am (UTC)
idk i find it freaking hilarious
horrorparties 24th-Nov-2009 03:25 am (UTC)
this is low but werk it anja
gorgeousdoll 24th-Nov-2009 03:25 am (UTC)
FUKC SOMEONE DIED BYET BUT I FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE IN THIS WHOLE POSTG HERE
redcurrantbasil 24th-Nov-2009 03:39 am (UTC)
What is happening girl?
no_x_doubts 24th-Nov-2009 08:39 am (UTC)
what happened bb!
pagesixsixsix 24th-Nov-2009 03:26 am (UTC)
This is all the more reason to put models back on the covers of fashion magazines. Then we don't have to worry about this.
yrutellingme 24th-Nov-2009 03:34 am (UTC)
this.
hardcoresince3 24th-Nov-2009 03:38 am (UTC)
iawtc
peela 24th-Nov-2009 03:40 am (UTC)
YES.
samanarana 24th-Nov-2009 03:55 am (UTC)
Fuck that. I like to have women actually doing shit besides starving themselves to stare at while I'm checking out at H-E-B.
underdog_ontop 24th-Nov-2009 04:32 am (UTC)
H-E-B holla!
traversant 24th-Nov-2009 05:10 am (UTC)
THIS
fraggleroq 24th-Nov-2009 03:26 am (UTC)
hahahahah FAIL! good work W, way to promote "good body image for women" and all that jazz.
strictlytrash 24th-Nov-2009 03:53 am (UTC)
Yeah, they superimpose images of good bodies onto women.
probot 24th-Nov-2009 03:27 am (UTC)
Hey but the good thing is that they at LEAST have a great graphic designer.
imbehindthseyes 24th-Nov-2009 03:36 am (UTC)
uh, not really. the whole reason this was even an issue is because of the whole thigh mishap, and then they realized that its not even her body to begin with.
probot 24th-Nov-2009 03:40 am (UTC)
No, I meant that at least you can't tell it's a "fake" body at first sight. Of course it looks out of proportion but at least is way better than most of the airbrushing we see these days on magazines.
excelente 24th-Nov-2009 03:31 am (UTC)
It's like the Julia Roberts' Redbook cover drama:



At least it's still Julia's body in the picture though.
littlesun_shine 24th-Nov-2009 03:32 am (UTC)
what happned here?
courtneyfrances 24th-Nov-2009 03:34 am (UTC)
they shopped a horse's mouth onto her face.
excelente 24th-Nov-2009 03:47 am (UTC)
The body shot is from some event she went to.

luvherbones 24th-Nov-2009 04:39 am (UTC)
the best part is THE REAL JULIA plastered across her shopped torso.
no_x_doubts 24th-Nov-2009 08:40 am (UTC)
lol wowwwwwza GIANT HEAD
gabzillaz 24th-Nov-2009 03:31 am (UTC)
Oh God her legs D:

That's fucked up-
makedonikos 24th-Nov-2009 03:31 am (UTC)
As someone who has been through extensive Photoshop, digital imaging, and photography classes for the past 3 years, I know for a FACT that W Magazine and Demi Moore are lying about the cover to an absurd degree. Does W Magazine think that computer-savvy people DON'T SEE their magazine covers? Come on now...

I read a quote on another news site that W Magazine claimed that the photographers did nothing "out of the ordinary" during the shoot. I believe that, because it's not the photographers' jobs to have digital enhancement and retouching expertise. All they really needed to do was to get Demi in remotely similar poses as the Anja pictures in order to create that cover. Once a series of pictures are taken that have slightly different positional elements, superimposing is a fast task for any professional photo editor. When you have a series of photos like that, you can really create a whole new image from bits and pieces of other different photos with ease.

The things that really stick out to me in the Demi cover versus the Anja photos (particularly the first one) are certain muscle positions and body posture. Take a look at Demi's neck and left shoulder where the muscles are accentuated. Obviously parts of Demi's real neck have been slimmed, but overall, the neck/shoulder possess a higher "concentration" of Anja's neck than other areas of the body. Another thing that stands out is the left arm muscle tone and position. I would assume that the imaging experts in charge of the cover took certain aspects of Anja's arm (such as pre-existing shadows and natural sculpture) and layered it on to Demi's photo(s). This is a very common procedure for making photo subjects look thinner in certain areas, and some celebrities even demand it. The team at W Magazine, though, took it a little too far and thus made it quite obvious.

Anyway. Just my evaluation.
littlesun_shine 24th-Nov-2009 03:33 am (UTC)
how did they do the skin match up? im just curious i havent used photoshop too much
twoseamfastball 24th-Nov-2009 04:56 am (UTC)
It's not too hard when you have two people with similar skin tones photographed under similar (especially similarly bright/harsh) light. Anja and Demi are both white-- get them both photographed in high key lighting coming from the same direction and you don't even have to do too much to make the skin more or less match up.
courtneyfrances 24th-Nov-2009 03:35 am (UTC)
you rock. nice to have informed opinions and not just lol omg.
redcurrantbasil 24th-Nov-2009 03:39 am (UTC)
That was actually interesting and informative.
Thank you
imbehindthseyes 24th-Nov-2009 03:39 am (UTC)
awesome. thats something i would really like to get into, and i already am pretty good an photoshop. where did you learn this stuff? do you have like a college degree for it?
roxi9 24th-Nov-2009 03:42 am (UTC)
Exactly what I was thinking, but didn't know how to put it in words.
sanstexte 24th-Nov-2009 03:42 am (UTC)
Your icon amuses me. Take that happy happyist!
placetohide Basically24th-Nov-2009 04:01 am (UTC)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
breakfastserial 24th-Nov-2009 04:02 am (UTC)
this was a very useful comment, ty bb
peopleareshapes 24th-Nov-2009 04:11 am (UTC)
As someone who has had extensive training seeing with their eyes, I am in complete agreement. This is most definitely a case of shoppage.
no_x_doubts 24th-Nov-2009 08:41 am (UTC)
yeah i was going to say, i mean im not as good as you or have that much experience but ive been doing illustrator /ps HW for the past 2 hours then came into this post lol and its like... who are u kidding demi
pink__sparklies 24th-Nov-2009 03:31 am (UTC)
Shocking...
lady_sativa 24th-Nov-2009 03:33 am (UTC)
LMFAO @ Demi being delusional & thinking it was her body. Total 2nd hand embarassment for her right now.
yrutellingme 24th-Nov-2009 03:33 am (UTC)
shittttt
irenenesser 24th-Nov-2009 03:34 am (UTC)
Oh shit.
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 10:31 pm GMT.