ONTD

6:55 pm - 11/19/2009

Critics Slam New Moon

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
New Moon pales in comparison to Twilight, according to the critics.

Chicago Sun-Times' Roger Ebert says "the characters in this movie should be arrested for loitering with intent to moan. Never have teenagers been in greater need of a jump-start. Granted some of them are more than 100 years old, but still: their charisma is by Madame Tussaud."

Ty Burr of The Boston Globe remarks: "Sorry, girls: The thrill is gone." He says that "where the first film’s director, Catherine Hardwicke, plugged into [author Stephenie] Meyer’s vision of supernatural teenage lust with abandon, Chris Weitz is stuck with a sequel that’s a morning-after mope-fest."

Burr also says that the film favors werewolf Jacob (Taylor Lautner) than vampire Edward (Robert Pattinson).

"When he's onscreen, Pattinson’s Edward is all emo posturing under a trembling bouffant - the actor suddenly seems to be embarrassed to be here," says Burr. "Lautner's performance, by contrast, has the warmth of an actual human."

But Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times says Lautner and Kristen Stewart (who plays Bella) have no heat: "The connection between these two is so self-evidently non-romantic that it turns out not to be much of a diversion."

USA Today's Claudia Puig agrees, saying the the Bella-Edward romance is a bore and that "the pace picks up" once Jacob and his pals turn into werewolves. She gave the film 2.5 out of 4 stars.

Variety writes that ladies hoping to gaze at Pattinson the big screen "may be disappointed by Pattinson's reduced presence" in the sequel, "as his Edward appears predominantly in mumbling visions until a cliffhanger that brazenly sets up the next episode."

Despite some harsh reviews, the film is still expected to earn more than $85 million during its first weekend (it has run up the biggest advance sales of any film in history). It opens in 4,024 locations, beginning with 3,500 performances at 12:01 a.m. Friday.

us
[info]assula 20th-Nov-2009 12:56 am (UTC)
GOOD
[info]assula 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
Shitty first comment.

[info]musiclover011 20th-Nov-2009 01:03 am (UTC)
A+ gif save tho

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
[info]imemine69 20th-Nov-2009 01:09 am (UTC)
Nice save though lol
[info]joaniemaloney 20th-Nov-2009 01:19 am (UTC)
;D
[info]matthewgoodband 20th-Nov-2009 03:57 am (UTC)
lol I love this gif
[info]fromahippie 20th-Nov-2009 10:23 am (UTC)
LOL
[info]industrialness 20th-Nov-2009 12:57 am (UTC)
I love this critic.
[info]fwee_prower 20th-Nov-2009 01:12 am (UTC)
it's a bunch of different critics. over 56 critics have slammed new moon
[info]qp 20th-Nov-2009 12:57 am (UTC)
the thrill was never there in the first place. and good luck telling twihards that.
[info]ourabouras 20th-Nov-2009 06:17 pm (UTC)
it's as if they thought the first movie was. . . good 0.o (i just barfed a little in my mouth)
[info]qp 20th-Nov-2009 10:27 pm (UTC)
now, now... *pats* it'll be okay. when the baby boom for twilight names recedes in fifteen to twenty years.
[info]sleevesofsatin 20th-Nov-2009 12:57 am (UTC)
lol that poster
[info]smasherette 20th-Nov-2009 02:19 am (UTC)
I know, is that for real?
[info]stellawuzadiver 20th-Nov-2009 02:30 am (UTC)
That's what I came to find out.
[info]fever_pitch_ 20th-Nov-2009 07:08 am (UTC)
noo.
[info]lightsandbuzz 20th-Nov-2009 12:57 am (UTC)
f this shit, i'm seeing PRECIOUS at midnight. SO PSYCHED
[info]prettysighs 20th-Nov-2009 01:03 am (UTC)
omg bb you are so lucky. i have yet to see thid movie
[info]joaniemaloney 20th-Nov-2009 01:18 am (UTC)
I think I'm going to see that tomorrow. FINALLY OPENING HERE, YESS.
[info]highd 20th-Nov-2009 02:55 am (UTC)
I am super jealous of you !!!
[info]senkig 20th-Nov-2009 03:01 am (UTC)
THIS IS ME BEING REALLY JEALOUS OF YOU
[info]bigasaberry 20th-Nov-2009 05:20 am (UTC)
I just came home from it. Soooo effing good.
[info]fogandpearls 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
i just don't understand how anyone is surprised by how shitty the sequel would be to accompany its shitty predecessor
[info]melindil 20th-Nov-2009 01:15 am (UTC)
ikr?
[info]pensarelove 20th-Nov-2009 01:58 am (UTC)
mte
[info]rabbitncavylove 20th-Nov-2009 02:19 am (UTC)
Maybe they were expecting more due to better director and budget .. idk
[info]tranboleyn 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
Too bad it doesn't matter. Moneymaker is a moneymaker, reviews are irrelevant.
[info]indy788 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
exactly.
[info]fogandpearls 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
trufax
[info]horizongold 20th-Nov-2009 01:15 am (UTC)
ikr
[info]endingonfire 20th-Nov-2009 01:17 am (UTC)
unfortunately. BUT I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY ONTDers ARE PAYING TO SEE THIS. Fuck the lulz, where are your standards.
[info]kiokushitakaa 20th-Nov-2009 03:00 am (UTC)
Srsly, lulz should be pirated.
[info]joaniemaloney 20th-Nov-2009 01:18 am (UTC)
YUP.
[info]visceralvamp 20th-Nov-2009 01:44 am (UTC)
Unfortunate but true.
[info]hologrphcbuddha 20th-Nov-2009 04:11 am (UTC)
Yup
[info]shanny_w 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
YOU JUST DONT UNDERSTAND TRUE LOVE! T________T
[info]mumblebeee 20th-Nov-2009 01:17 am (UTC)
lol irl
[info]saint4u 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
Im not a real fan of the books and the movie series but tbh you cannot ignore that Summit pretty much were blatant at who they were making this for and were very unappologetic about it. The target demographic they are aiming this for is going to lap this up regardless and make them rich and rich and rich and us madder and madder and madder lol
[info]blumenfeuer 20th-Nov-2009 01:00 am (UTC)
ahaha ikr? it's not like they're going for an oscar
[info]eeagle 20th-Nov-2009 01:06 am (UTC)
true dat girl. plus you got a Merlin icon! Pedo bear approves
[info]vikingsmn 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
Roger Ebert's review made me laugh so hard.

Yes, Edward (Robert Pattinson) is back in school, repeating the 12th grade for the 84th time. Bella sees him in the school parking lot, walking toward her in slow-motion, wearing one of those Edwardian Beatles jackets with a velvet collar, pregnant with his beauty.
[info]indy788 20th-Nov-2009 12:59 am (UTC)
rofl pregnant with his beauty. I love that man
[info]highd 20th-Nov-2009 02:57 am (UTC)
Jesus Christ your icon is scary!!!
[info]realityvsdreams 20th-Nov-2009 12:59 am (UTC)
I seriously love that man's snark.
[info]downerdebbie 20th-Nov-2009 01:00 am (UTC)
lmao he's awesome
[info]puta_estupida 20th-Nov-2009 01:01 am (UTC)
That whole review was fucking GOLD.
[info]degele 20th-Nov-2009 01:01 am (UTC)
lmfao loves it
[info]chomper_go_rawr 20th-Nov-2009 01:01 am (UTC)
LOL
[info]_beka 20th-Nov-2009 01:02 am (UTC)
LOL LOVE HIM!
[info]maxvinyl 20th-Nov-2009 01:13 am (UTC)
omg that is the most beautiful thing I have ever heard
[info]dealatedwren 20th-Nov-2009 01:20 am (UTC)
L O L
[info]_inlikeflynn 20th-Nov-2009 01:22 am (UTC)
omfg. lmao i love him.
[info]riddlemethis 20th-Nov-2009 01:23 am (UTC)
LMAO I love him.
[info]syzygy09 20th-Nov-2009 01:24 am (UTC)
I read his full review earlier today knowing full well it would be hilarious. I wasn't disappointed.

He's the only critic I care about.
[info]rampant_chaos8 20th-Nov-2009 01:32 am (UTC)
OMFG LOL
[info]memento 20th-Nov-2009 01:42 am (UTC)
I knew his review was going to be great and lol'd mightily when he posted it.
[info]milkradio 20th-Nov-2009 01:42 am (UTC)
LOLOL I hope this makes it into another copy of Your Movie Sucks. Ebert's bad reviews are so fucking hilarious to read.
[info]anakisa 20th-Nov-2009 01:42 am (UTC)
irlol! i <3 him.
[info]beautifiers 20th-Nov-2009 01:49 am (UTC)
LMAO
[info]orbandsceptre 20th-Nov-2009 01:54 am (UTC)
Ebert could out snark all of ONTD with his hands tied behind his back.
[info]jellibeen 20th-Nov-2009 02:08 am (UTC)
lmao, that review was pure gold
[info]bienenkiste 20th-Nov-2009 02:37 am (UTC)
LMAO OMFG THIS IS SO A+ IDEK

BTW USING "PREGNANT WITH HIS BEAUTY" IRL
[info]highd 20th-Nov-2009 02:56 am (UTC)
His review of Transformers 2 is hung in my office. He rocked that one out.
[info]senkig 20th-Nov-2009 03:02 am (UTC)
he's my hero of the day.
[info]kawaii_chicken 20th-Nov-2009 03:26 am (UTC)
that was too beautiful
[info]sonjamillicent 20th-Nov-2009 03:59 am (UTC)
I love him when he reviews something bad. His Transformers review from earlier this year was amazing.
[info]x_sweetsurprise 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
can't this movie just be banned out of the century already?
[info]vivisco 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
NO WAY. Who would've thought this movie would get bad reviews?
[info]realityvsdreams 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
It's still going to make a shit ton of money.
[info]theclearskies 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
are they saying it's worse than twilight? how is that even possible.
[info]cinnamonscars 20th-Nov-2009 12:59 am (UTC)
Why, hello there comment twin.
[info]beautifiers 20th-Nov-2009 01:51 am (UTC)
trust me, it is.
of the books, twilight is definitely the best. everything after that just slips right on down into deeper levels of bullshit
[info]watistrainwreck 20th-Nov-2009 02:26 am (UTC)
lol It is possible. It felt like 6 hours long and was pretty boring cause it was mostly Jacob.
[info]cinnamonscars 20th-Nov-2009 12:58 am (UTC)
Wait, it's worse than Twilight? I didn't think that was possible.
[info]offinlahlahland 20th-Nov-2009 03:01 am (UTC)
It's a sequel.

Of course it's fucking possible.
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 10:49 pm GMT.