ONTD

6:06 pm - 11/09/2009

AW HELL NAH! WILL SMITH TO GO FULL RETARD

Will Smith to Remake Flowers for Algernon

Two-time Academy Award nominee, Will Smith, may have found the project that will finally win him that elusive Oscar. According to our inside source, The Hollywood Cog, Smith is set to produce and star in Flowers for Algernon, a modern-day adaptation of the Daniel Keyes’ novel. The movie is being set up at Sony Pictures and Smith’s production company, Overbrook Entertainment, along with Polksy Films. Tracy Nyberg, an associate producer on Hancock and an assistant to Will Smith on I Am Legend, is also set to produce.

Flowers for Algernon has been adapted several times since it was originally published in 1959, most famously Ralph Nelson’s Charly, which won Cliff Robertson an Academy Award in 1969. The short story (and the subsequent novel) is about Charlie, a mentally retarded man who is the first human test subject for an experimental surgery that artificially increases intelligence. The experiment had already been performed successfully on Algernon, a lab mouse. Charlie’s newfound intelligence (his IQ skyrockets from 68 to 185), however, comes at the cost of his ability to socialize normally, as he becomes increasingly alienated from those around him. Emotional consequences are involved when Charlie learns the truth of the experiment.

The project seems ideal for Smith, who was nominated for an Oscar for his performances in Ali and Pursuit of Happyness. Smith will bring his populist appeal to yet another Oscar contender.

Smith has several other projects currently in development, including an American remake of Oldboy, potential sequels to Hancock and I, Robot, in addition to a prequel to I Am Legend. No word on where Flowers for Algernon will fall into Smith’s filming schedule, but I’d expect the project to be fast-tracked, once a director comes aboard. And though no director has been announced, Smith’s Happyness and Seven Pounds collaborator, Gabriele Muccino, seems a likely candidate.

source
Page 1 of 9
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] >>
[info]epouvante 10th-Nov-2009 02:20 am (UTC)
lol @ the title. u cold.
[info]tiddlywinks103 10th-Nov-2009 04:26 am (UTC)
LOL ikr?
[info]fifthmorn 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
.......................................................wut?

Why do they have to keep remaking every single movie? There are plenty of books that haven't been made into movies if you're oh-so-terribly-desperate for scripts.

Edited at 2009-11-10 02:23 am (UTC)
[info]animalyears 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
gene-ass
[info]devon_carrots 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
when will you make a movie that won't make me cry
[info]gingaling 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
good god.
[info]i_said_boourns 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
D:
[info]ecctv 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
Oh God. This will get him an Oscar.

1-animals
2-mental handicappedness
[info]probot 10th-Nov-2009 02:26 am (UTC)
mte
[info]_xxtom 10th-Nov-2009 02:46 am (UTC)
fo sho
[info]tresjolie9 10th-Nov-2009 04:37 am (UTC)
And he isn't really going "full retard," only partial retard, so he may get an Oscar nod for this after all.

[info]anonymously_hip 10th-Nov-2009 03:46 pm (UTC)
Everybody knows you never go full retard. Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, 'Rain Man,' look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Counted toothpicks, cheated cards. Autistic, sho'. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, 'Forrest Gump.' Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't retarded. Peter Sellers, "Being There." Infantile, yes. Retarded, no. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard. You don't buy that? Ask Sean Penn, 2001, "I Am Sam." Remember? Went full retard, went home empty handed...
[info]briecheesie 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
this story made me cry, negl
[info]ludagurl3d 10th-Nov-2009 03:48 am (UTC)
me too. i couldn't finish it actually because it was so sad. i read it in middle school by accident. i was bored senseless by the required reading, ignored that, and read this book instead lol.
[info]etherdepository 10th-Nov-2009 06:12 am (UTC)
same here :(
[info]now_all_is_well 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
LOL at the title!
[info]irrevokable 10th-Nov-2009 02:21 am (UTC)
god i'm already tearing up just thinking about this book.
[info]algore_galore 10th-Nov-2009 02:22 am (UTC)
maaaaaaan i read this shit in like 8th grade, it was really sad
[info]kerfuffleboat 10th-Nov-2009 02:22 am (UTC)
omg even the thought of this makes me want to cryyyyyyyyyyyy
[info]jesusland_pa 10th-Nov-2009 02:22 am (UTC)
We may both be from Philadelphia, Will Smith, but if you fuck this up, I will fuck YOU up.
[info]i_said_boourns 10th-Nov-2009 02:22 am (UTC)
Actually, I'm on board since this is a new adaptation and not a straight up remake of Charly, which was... um... not my favorite movie. Let's leave it at that.
[info]_kataomoi_ 10th-Nov-2009 02:50 am (UTC)
Same here, bb. You type truth. When I read it I was like "WOOOOOOOOOO A MOVIE!" then I see it and I'm like
[info]i_said_boourns 10th-Nov-2009 03:20 am (UTC)
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!

yeah, pretty much. I loved the book and was so excited to see Charly and it was just awkwardly adapted. wtf. :/
[info]cheryb 10th-Nov-2009 02:22 am (UTC)
this book had me crying like a bitch.
i don't approve of him playing charly though.
[info]earenwe 10th-Nov-2009 03:36 am (UTC)
this is it, exactly. this was one of my favorite books as a kid, and I still love it, but...really, does it need to be a film? Also, him as Charly....I just don't see it.
[info]worryful 10th-Nov-2009 05:06 am (UTC)
I thought of Charly as.. white
Page 1 of 9
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 10:47 pm GMT.