ONTD

3:35 am - 04/27/2008

New Radar Cover

Maddox and Suri Grace the Cover of the New Issue of Radar  



Source

Discuss.
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
[info]penfold 27th-Apr-2008 07:37 am (UTC)
what the fuck?
[info]telegram_ 27th-Apr-2008 07:38 am (UTC)
bad photoshopping just got worse.
[info]amateur_photog 27th-Apr-2008 07:38 am (UTC)
I would be irate if a magazine put my kids on the cover like that.
[info]nurani 27th-Apr-2008 07:39 am (UTC)
worst photoshop ever.
[info]peopleclimber 27th-Apr-2008 07:39 am (UTC)
suri looks like she is headed to the bathroom with some light reading.
[info]battlingennui 27th-Apr-2008 03:33 pm (UTC)
lol
[info]missklutz16 27th-Apr-2008 07:39 am (UTC)
did they get permission to put those kid's faces on the cover? couldn't they get sued over shit like that?
[info]jebe 27th-Apr-2008 07:54 am (UTC)
I dont' think so, Radar's covers are always celebrity manips
[info]paparatti 27th-Apr-2008 01:04 pm (UTC)
Probably don't need it - if they bought the pictures from paparazzi, who photograph in public, then the papz own the copyright and no one else. Public photography is legal, and trust me, that's a good thing.
[info]paparatti 27th-Apr-2008 01:04 pm (UTC)
by pictures, I meant the headshots, obv.
[info]groovylilkitten 27th-Apr-2008 01:22 pm (UTC)
It is legal, but there are also legalities about publishing someone's photo without permission, especially of a minor. When we were shooting stuff for film class, whether it was a documentary we had to put together or a scene we had to write, we had to get permission to use people's images if it wasn't part of a "general scene" or something. I doubt there will be lawsuits, but there is the potential of one because I doubt any of the parents signed permission.

[info]loveporfavor 27th-Apr-2008 02:43 pm (UTC)
Agreed.
[info]cluelesslyred 27th-Apr-2008 07:39 am (UTC)
wth?
[info]missklutz16 27th-Apr-2008 07:40 am (UTC)
also, lol at maddox reading life & style. does anyone read life & style?
[info]diapergenie 27th-Apr-2008 11:51 am (UTC)
lol no.
[info]rootwalla 27th-Apr-2008 05:26 pm (UTC)
my mom. :[
she buys life & style, star, & all those other mags you see at the checkout. they're good for when you're takin' a shit.
[info]concise 27th-Apr-2008 07:41 am (UTC)
Horrible photoshopping.

I sense a lawsuit.
[info]koalafrog 27th-Apr-2008 08:43 am (UTC)
Nah, Radar does this for every issue, and this is by far one of their more tame (remember the Prince Harry in his undies cover?). If they didn't get sued by Cruise for last month's Scientology "expose", then nothing will stop them.
[info]jmr429 27th-Apr-2008 07:41 am (UTC)
MADDOX IS FREAKING AWESOME AND SURI JUST SEEMS WEIRD. WHAT DO I KNOW IT WAS MY BDAY PARTRY TONIGHT AND I'M FUCKEED UP!
[info]jewdiful 27th-Apr-2008 07:57 am (UTC)
happy birthday
[info]ex_jughoood 27th-Apr-2008 07:41 am (UTC)
i'm so jealous of suri tbh
[info]numbereleven 27th-Apr-2008 07:42 am (UTC)
Suri wouldn't be caught dead in that. What's wrong with them?
[info]chrisgold 27th-Apr-2008 06:24 pm (UTC)
LOL, that was my first thought too. Do they see how Suri dresses. I just don't think she'd go for that outfit. Maybe the skirt.
[info]_katttttt_ 27th-Apr-2008 07:42 am (UTC)
horrible photoshopping, and "Suri" has such ugly clothes on.
[info]rox0rz007 27th-Apr-2008 07:43 am (UTC)
nice icon :D
[info]_katttttt_ 27th-Apr-2008 07:49 am (UTC)
SNAP! how can you not love patsy
[info]tx5mym5 27th-Apr-2008 07:45 am (UTC)
I think Suri's clothes are adorable. On someone over 15.
[info]redundant 27th-Apr-2008 07:43 am (UTC)
lmao seriously i don't care how bad the photoshop is, that shit is hilar
[info]asouthernthing 27th-Apr-2008 07:43 am (UTC)
I just want the 10 pages of half naked olympians
[info]dnfrommn 27th-Apr-2008 02:10 pm (UTC)
seconded!
[info]battlingennui 27th-Apr-2008 03:34 pm (UTC)
THIRD
[info]laura_anne 27th-Apr-2008 11:09 pm (UTC)
yes, this.
[info]_unkosher 28th-Apr-2008 05:42 am (UTC)
yes! link!
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 6:39 pm GMT.