ONTD

9:52 pm - 04/18/2005

Jane article by Rapaport about Lyonne

I mentioned the Jane article that Michael Rapaport wrote about Natasha Lyonne (see post before about the police biznaz) and people wanted to read the Jane article, SOOOO I thought I'd be a dear and scan in the pages for your pleasure.

Mr. Rapaport is an awesome actor, but WOAH! she is going to be mad when she sees this little number. I'd be a scared little lamb.

Image hosted by TinyPic.com

I used Image Shack so they wouldn't get re-sized and so people could read the text, so they WILL break. I'll fix when I can.

¡challah!



I can't decide who I feel more bad for. The girl clearly has problems and sounds like a freak, but to write about it in Jane??...I'd be pissed if I was her.

I LOVE him as an actor, he is a favorite of mine, but I hope he tried some other routes first....


----------------------------
**An amendment: Apparently he may have abused ex-girlfriend Lili Taylor in the past, but I couldn't find anything that says specifically that, not that it isn't true, I just couldn't find it. I'm no legal law specialist guru, and I have no desire to find out what exactly "aggravated harassment" is since I need to hit the hay, but if someone wants to inform the masses, feel free. So this is all I saw on my lazy-ass google, from this not so convincing website: http://www.tribute.ca/bio.asp?id=3153:

"On the personal side, Rapaport was dating Lili Taylor and in May 1998, pleaded guilty to aggravated harrassment and was ordered to stay away from her and to be in counseling for a year."

This thickens the plot...
-----------------------------

Any legal eagles know if he could get busted for defamation of character or anything?...Probably not, huh?

Clickity-click-click.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
skyfading 19th-Apr-2005 05:14 am (UTC)
lmao.

damn, natasha.
oceancurrents 19th-Apr-2005 05:14 am (UTC)
i read this yesterday- i love trashy articles like this. i'm sure she's gotta be hella pissed about this too. but you know what?

SO.NOT.SUPRISED.
elizawrites 19th-Apr-2005 05:19 am (UTC)
That's fucking sad. She clearly has some mental health issues. I understand why he had to evict her, but to publicly humiliate her like that? I hope he got his money back telling his story. What a dick.
elizawrites 19th-Apr-2005 05:19 am (UTC)
Selling. Selling his story.
agateway 19th-Apr-2005 05:43 am (UTC)
16 grand worth of damages, threats to tenants, and he will always have the people streaming over there looking for her cracked out ass that could hurt other tenants? he's more than justified in writing that. he should sue her but that would invite her back into his life and from what it sounds like, he wants her GONE.
film_critter 19th-Apr-2005 06:19 am (UTC)
agreed. He should have sued her ass. Hell i would have. But he had good reason for not suing like you said.
iamkat 19th-Apr-2005 05:21 am (UTC)
absolutely love the typo of the word "working" as "workirg"...

thanks for the scans...

makes procrastinators like me's job a hell of a lot easier...

~kels... 73 words down, 1437 left...
autotomy 19th-Apr-2005 05:29 am (UTC)
oh wow, crazy natasha... but why is he selling his story to Jane?
volvocowgirl99 19th-Apr-2005 05:34 am (UTC)
yeah, i read this in my JANE when it came in the mail today... she sounds psycho! and i totally believe it.
dear_lavinia 19th-Apr-2005 06:41 am (UTC)
Why did I get my Jane yet? *pouts* Oh wait, because I live in Canada!
comeseekme 19th-Apr-2005 05:35 am (UTC)
good for him.

and legally if you are a public figure of any kind (i.e. actor, politican, musician, etc.) you can't sue for defamation of character. something I actually absorbed from my PR class.
matty_minogue 19th-Apr-2005 06:27 am (UTC)
wow really? i thought they could since tom cruise sues pretty much anyone who says he's gay. or maybe that's something different?
dukecutie_19 19th-Apr-2005 06:45 am (UTC)
I am pre law... and i believe its called "Actual malice" or something like that... and if you declare that and can prove it, then you can sue.

... Its next to impossible to prove actual malice, because you have to be able to prove and back up the fact that the person was indeed out to get you and was doing it for nothing more than to hurt you and defame your name...

So, basically, celebs dont go throug hall of that trouble... but Tom Cruise had enough to show that the person was out for nothing but money, and to ruin his name!
veritaserum 19th-Apr-2005 05:39 am (UTC)
god damn it, i wish my copy of this month's issue would get here already. grrr.
mrscolbert 19th-Apr-2005 05:58 pm (UTC)
it's a good one!
stoic_seraph 19th-Apr-2005 05:39 am (UTC)
I kind of miss the box and exclamation points. At least that was a symbol that I could interpret. Ichallah?
hell_is_4_heros 19th-Apr-2005 05:54 am (UTC)
dammit, it's supposed to be an upside down exclamation point (like en espanol) and the word challah and another regular exclamation point....Bah, now I have to re-think this all. I'm a freak :)
stoic_seraph 19th-Apr-2005 05:58 am (UTC)
Lol I'm familiar with the upside down exclamation point (I speak Spanish), but it totally looks like an "i". I hope you find peace in the perfect signature soon ;) haha.

And thanks muches for the scans.
veryfakejournal 19th-Apr-2005 02:47 pm (UTC)
You could just...not use a signature. You know, and not look like a moron? Yeah.
Good post, though.
agateway 19th-Apr-2005 05:41 am (UTC)
holy shit.

thanks for posting this. she's fucking nuts, seriously.
agateway 19th-Apr-2005 05:45 am (UTC)
and defamation of character? nah. he could sue her for the 16 grand in damages plus property value dropping because of what she did to the place. she turned it into her own crack den and then threatened people who lived there besides making the area unsafe for anyone. she had no concern for anyone but herself and he's justified in writing it. hell, if I was Michael, I would send it to anyone who would print it so she couldn't get a lease.
lyingtodeath 19th-Apr-2005 07:33 am (UTC)
she's a public figure.
her8track 19th-Apr-2005 05:46 am (UTC)
lol. i still like her. i dont know why.

i hated her in American Pie though./
stoic_seraph 19th-Apr-2005 05:59 am (UTC)
Did you love her in The Slums of Beverly Hills? I really did. I don't know why, but I did. And I hated her in American Pie. Bah.
her8track 19th-Apr-2005 07:21 pm (UTC)
yeah! i watched it when i was 15 or 16 or something, and then i saw the dvd in a shop last week for realllll cheap, i couldnt resist!

and so i came home and watched it and i thought, since i watched it when i was that young that i was probably thought that any movie with a teenage girl as the main protagonist was amazing that the movie might actually suck, haha but i still liked it, and she is totally adorable in it, and yeah i love her all over again! haha so thats my story

but, ick! i hated her role in american pie.
biklar 19th-Apr-2005 05:53 am (UTC)
Wow seriously she sounds like she may be severely bipolar and even a bit borderline...definitely with mental health issues.



thisgirlcandy 19th-Apr-2005 02:13 pm (UTC)
that's what i was thinking. very sad.
sweet_tiffany82 19th-Apr-2005 03:12 pm (UTC)
she does..
jessizombie 19th-Apr-2005 05:16 pm (UTC)
I have borderline personality disorder and don't act like that, but I guess it's possible, she definately has some sort mental health issue.
apartmentlife 19th-Apr-2005 06:01 am (UTC)
But she screwed me. She can kiss my ass.

Classic. :)
smokeandtears 19th-Apr-2005 06:02 am (UTC)
That's really sad, actually.

She needs to detox and get some counseling.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
This page was loaded May 23rd 2013, 11:30 pm GMT.