ONTD

10:11 pm - 05/01/2007

Bigger is better?

The new Harry Potter posters seem to have "changed" for their IMAX version. Emma Watson's puppies seem to be growing in front of our eyes.



Emma Watson in 3D
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix movie poster
Warner Bros. has released the U.S. domestic Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix movie poster. The poster features “Dumbledore’s Army” flanking an older Harry Potter. The movie covers the fifth year at the Hogwarts school, with Harry and his classmates doing battle against evil Lord Voldemort. The film poster itself is a bit understated (and far removed from the whimsy and the teen angst of past Harry Potter movie posters), and is using a variation of the ever popular “Flying V” cast line-up formation made popular by Miramax.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix will also be showing in IMAX theaters. Apparently Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: An IMAX 3D Experience will feature a 20 minuted enhanced 3D finale. Speaking of 3D “enhancements”, star Emma Watson’s chest appears a bit larger in Harry Potter IMAX ads when compared to the Order of the Phoenix poster, even though they are both based around the same artwork.

Although Hollywood (and media in general) has a long history of “augmentation via Photoshop” in advertising, this instance is less obvious than other examples. But it is hard to resist pointing out Hermione Granger’s breast growth spurt in this case when the artwork is for a 3D movie from a theater chain with the motto “Think Big”. (This also invokes memories of a Saturday Night Live Harry Potter skit from a few years ago.)

Why is there a difference between the two pieces of Potter key art? Since the IMAX version of the poster art appeared online before the final Harry Potter one-sheet, we can only speculate that Warner Bros. gave the IMAX ad group an earlier “comp” version of the artwork prior to being finalized for the studio’s own press run. There are other subtle differences between the two: the domestic one-sheet version of Herminoe Granger features a less flowing hair style, probably because her hair in the IMAX version blocks more of actor Matt Lewis (as Neville Longbottom) standing behind Emma Watson.





Source

So it's basically a kids movie, right? But I guess the original fans have grown since the first flick. Maybe this is their way of keeping those teenaged boys interested? Who knows?

ETA: It looks like the force of the boob growth must've kicked up a breeze. Cuz in the IMAX version, her hair is blowing in some crazy isolated wind. Hmmm...her waist has also become a bit more shapely.
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
[info]eternalwings 2nd-May-2007 10:12 am (UTC)
LOL.
[info]myfreya__andme 2nd-May-2007 04:12 pm (UTC)
haha niiiice.
[info]queeenelizabeth 2nd-May-2007 05:27 am (UTC)
ohh harry potter. okay...

also

HIM who he dont speak of here has a post about her concert and we dont... what is the world coming to!
[info]matty_minogue 2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
seriously?

i'm going to have break my #1 rule of internet just so i can go to sleep.
[info]queeenelizabeth 2nd-May-2007 05:31 am (UTC)
he just had secret info to what she was wearing and he took it down! he's such a douche. ahhh hate him.
[info]gxxx 2nd-May-2007 06:08 pm (UTC)
What?
[info]pit_fashn 2nd-May-2007 05:27 am (UTC)
kiera is that u?????????
[info]chaneloflove 2nd-May-2007 05:28 am (UTC)
HWERE?!?!
[info]pit_fashn 2nd-May-2007 05:31 am (UTC)
she sort of looks like kiera knightley in that poster imo.
[info]pattieisntcrazy 2nd-May-2007 05:37 pm (UTC)
i thought you were alluding to the fact that keira also had the poster-boob-inflation thing for king arthur. and like, every other movie she's been in.
[info]megome FRAZZLES!2nd-May-2007 05:27 am (UTC)
y'all best put on your 3d glasses!

omgyay3dhp.lol emmas boobs grow before my very eyes.
[info]epicet 2nd-May-2007 05:27 am (UTC)
All I can pay attention to is the fact that Ginny is slowly killing my soul with her eyes.
[info]dandelionpretty 2nd-May-2007 06:48 pm (UTC)
LOL. Ginny?! I thought that was one of the W twins...
[info]philosophist 2nd-May-2007 05:29 am (UTC)
The position looks awkward. Perhaps it is because the poster-version of her apparently
has no arms?

Can't wait for this movie.
[info]ambire 2nd-May-2007 05:29 am (UTC)
[info]queeenelizabeth 2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
you're hilarious
[info]philosophist 2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
LOL
[info]natscookiejar 2nd-May-2007 05:31 am (UTC)
srsly. where are the britney updates>!?!!?!?!?!
[info]chaneloflove 2nd-May-2007 05:32 am (UTC)
That makes me sad. Especially since I can still sing along after all these years.
[info]recipesforcake 2nd-May-2007 05:35 am (UTC)
nice sneakers.
[info]teamouse 2nd-May-2007 05:36 am (UTC)
I remember in middle school, and thinking the part where the dancers made the big heart was ~so beautiful~ ...
[info]chaneloflove 2nd-May-2007 05:59 am (UTC)
That made me snort out loud.
[info]spited 2nd-May-2007 09:57 pm (UTC)
LOL ME TOO
[info]strippedxbeauty 2nd-May-2007 06:01 am (UTC)
oh hai thur childhood
Ugh I still remember all of the dance moves :[
[info]gabsy 2nd-May-2007 06:02 am (UTC)
I'd forgotten... she used to be pretty, and, well, normal.
[info]winnah330 after all these years.....2nd-May-2007 06:49 am (UTC)
dude, i remember on TRL they pointed out a girl scratching her crotch during the sitting down car scene!

it's a 2:30 left marker, check it out hahaha, gurl must've had a MAJOR itch.
[info]senorita__ 2nd-May-2007 03:37 pm (UTC)
it sucks, she looks older at 16 than i do now at 18 :(
[info]crossbones 2nd-May-2007 03:45 pm (UTC)
lol i still remember the part where the camera catches the girl scratching her crotch
[info]nodisrespect 2nd-May-2007 05:29 am (UTC)
she always looks really bloated and ugly and angular on the promo posters.
[info]chaneloflove ANYONE NOTICE2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
Emma's boobs in Imax artwork < Emma's boobs in the original artwork
[info]chaneloflove whoops it's the other way around2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
.
[info]sydnay Re: ANYONE NOTICE2nd-May-2007 04:14 pm (UTC)
er...that's exactly what this post is all about.
[info]chaneloflove Re: ANYONE NOTICE2nd-May-2007 11:43 pm (UTC)
Yeah got a little too excited to spot the difference I didn't exactly read the text.
[info]ambire 2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
That's one of my fav Brit Brit songs, it brings back memoriez from ~painful years~
[info]inside0ut_89 2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
Emmas tits still look kinda flat and weird.
[info]ambire 2nd-May-2007 05:30 am (UTC)
I mean Sometimes, the video above
[info]mylittlefriend From Perez2nd-May-2007 05:31 am (UTC)


PerezHilton.com had a top secret operative at Britney's concert at the House Of Blues in San Diego, and he're the rundown on what went down

She took to the stage shortly after 10 PM Pacific!

And she was done by 10:16 PM! And, in true Britney Spears fashion, she lipsynched her way through every single song!!

The Set List
Baby One More Time (Remix)
I'm A Slave For You
Breathe One Me
Do Something
Toxic
[info]natscookiejar Re: From Perez2nd-May-2007 05:31 am (UTC)
gross. of all sources not him
[info]queeenelizabeth Re: From Perez2nd-May-2007 05:32 am (UTC)
i got so fed up that i went there -- he said she was wearing a brown wig and sparkly bustier and white boots... an d then he took it down... i can't even remember what else was on there. i was so frazzled. and now i feel lame that i'm frazzled.
[info]foto_phreak Re: From Perez2nd-May-2007 05:32 am (UTC)
16 minutes? was it just a medley?!
[info]ambire 2nd-May-2007 05:33 am (UTC)
UGH PEREZ IS THE ANTI CHRIST, that being said

YAY I LOVE TOXIC & BABY ONE MORE TIME

long live the late 90's
[info]strongbutibreak 2nd-May-2007 05:34 am (UTC)
so, the '20 minute extra ending' version will only be imax?
that fucking sucks.
don't they think about other people who don't have an imax?
[info]zminotaur 2nd-May-2007 01:49 pm (UTC)
No, I think it's just that the last 20 minutes will be in 3-D if you see it at an IMAX.
[info]strongbutibreak 2nd-May-2007 10:17 pm (UTC)
oh ok.
:]
Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 3:11 pm GMT.