ONTD

12:52 pm - 03/08/2007

Calvin Klein to market new Fragrance, named in2u, to new Generation of "Technosexuals"


So apparently Calvin Klein is seeking to re-create the success CK "One" for a new Generation of young people, they have termed technosexuals, who spend their lives in front of their computer and identify more with internet speak than with real words. It's going to be called "in2u" - referring to a text message commonly seen as a request for casual sex (really? do you guys use this?). I am not joking - the article is from the New York Times. And even better? Check out the awesome tag-line from the press material: "She likes how he blogs, her texts turn him on. It’s intense. For right now."

March 8, 2007
How to Bottle a Generation
By ERIC WILSON

IN 1994, Calvin Klein designed a fragrance that embodied, in its flat little screw-top bottle, the disaffected, sexually ambivalent grunge youth of the moment. CK One, with its unconventional black and white advertisements filled with moping, androgynous models, was arguably the most perfectly tailored fragrance ever pitched to one market, breaking industry rules and records, selling 20 bottles per minute at its peak. A unisex brand that became the olfactory talisman of Generation X, CK One was so authentically grunge it was carried in record stores alongside albums by Nirvana.

Next month, Calvin Klein Inc. and Coty, its fragrance licensee, will introduce a sequel to CK One for a new generation, the so-called millennials, and in doing so, they will attempt to capture lightning in a bottle for a second time. Calvin Klein, now without its namesake designer, hopes to rejuvenate a fragrance embodying the essence of hip 20-somethings — even at the risk that such a notion is as outdated as a Prince song about partying like it’s 1999.

There are reasons to ask whether the Calvin Klein company can repeat its CK One success. The beauty industry has been in a slump for several years, facing a decline that is in part the result of young consumers spending more money on electronics than on fashion and fragrances. CK One offshoots — CK Be, introduced in 1996; several limited-edition bottle designs since 2000; and a fruitier CK One remix from the summer of 2004 — served as little more than stopgaps in the decline of a brand that, to today’s young adults, is as antiquated as shopping for music in a record store.

CK One, which had annual sales of about $90 million in the mid-1990s, now sells about $30 million in the United States, its reign having ended around the time Mr. Klein sold his company to Phillips-Van Heusen in 2002 and stepped back from daily involvement. Added to its other challenges, the Calvin Klein company is trying to develop a hit fragrance without the era-defining instincts Mr. Klein displayed in the days when he hired Brooke Shields to sell bluejeans. The only major figure to carry over from the creation of the original scent is Ann Gottlieb, a fragrance consultant and the nose of Calvin Klein since the designer started making scents in 1985. She described the concepts of CK One and its sequel “as different as red and yellow.”

Last month, in a minimal white conference room at the Calvin Klein offices on West 39th Street in the garment district, Tom Murry, the president of the company, reviewed a series of outtakes filmed for a commercial for the new fragrance. They depict the actor Kevin Zegers (who played the son of a pre-operative transsexual in “Transamerica”) in romantic pursuit of a model, Freja Beha Erichsen.

A companion ad to appear in magazines, photographed by the artsy duo Inez van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin (replacing Steven Meisel, who created the iconic CK One campaign), shows Ms. Erichsen leaning against a wall, tugging off Mr. Zegers’s belt as he twists a strand of her hair.

The page is layered with watery graffiti images of the words “sex” and “today,” and on top of that, as large as the models, two glass bottles shaped like rocket silos topped in white plastic casing and the name of the new scent: CK in2u.

Embedded in these images, as described by a half-dozen Calvin Klein and Coty executives gathered around a table, is a portrait of a generation they describe as physically bold but emotionally guarded, having grown up using computers as a primary means of interaction. Now young adults, they are post-Abercrombie, post-Juicy Couture and over any number of scents derived from the essences of Jennifer Lopez, Britney Spears and Paris Hilton.

The CK in2u bottle, designed by Stephen Burks, is made from the same materials — white plastic and glass — recognizable in an iPod. (Fabien Baron designed the original bottle.) The name is written in the shorthand of an instant message, a casual invitation to sex so immediate as to imply there was no time to spell it out: “in to you.”

“We have envisioned this as the first fragrance for the technosexual generation,” said Mr. Murry, using a term the company made up to describe its intended audience of thumb-texting young people whose romantic lives are defined in part by the casual hookup.

Last year, the company went so far as to trademark “technosexual,” anticipating it could become a buzzword for marketing to millennials, the roughly 80 million Americans born from 1982 to 1995. A typical line from the press materials for CK in2u goes like this: “She likes how he blogs, her texts turn him on. It’s intense. For right now.”

Which may turn off its intended audience by the tens of thousands.

Few consumers like being marketed to less than 20-somethings, and Calvin Klein and Coty know this because, as part of their development of CK in2u, they interviewed young consumers thought to be typical of their generation, including ones in the Dumbo and Williamsburg sections of Brooklyn.

“They have less brand loyalty,” said Lori Singer, a vice president for global marketing for Coty, referring to 20-somethings. “They don’t want to feel that they are being marketed to or spoken at. They are much more empowered, but they are unshockable. They have seen everything from 9/11 to Paris Hilton and Britney Spears without underwear. They see everything instantaneously that goes on in the world.”

Youngna Park, 24, a freelance photographer, would seem to be just this kind of individual and consumer. She has been interviewed by companies looking to tap into the millennial mind-set (though not by the researchers for CK in2u). Ms. Park moved to New York two and a half years ago and began taking pictures in restaurants and writing an online food column for Gothamist, a blog for urban markets. Her network of friends and professional contacts was forged partly through the Internet, and she has occasionally dated people she met online.

She would seem an ideal candidate to illustrate the term “technosexual,” if the idea did not immediately turn her off. “That’s such a weird phrase,” she said. “I just imagine kids putting on cologne to sit behind their computers. That’s really weird.”

A friend of Ms. Park’s, Zach Klein, 24, has also participated in market surveys attempting to distill his demographic, though he was skeptical of the idea of companies adapting to the language of the target audience.

“What’s most interesting about our generation is that it is very obvious when brands are attempting to market down to us when they use our own vernacular or types of personal technology,” Mr. Klein said. “It’s very transparent, and I tend to shy away.”

Mr. Klein (no relation to Calvin) was a partner in the Web site CollegeHumor.com when it was sold to Barry Diller’s IAC/Interactive and is now developing a music site. He said he admired the Calvin Klein brand and its marketing, but “abbreviating in2u like that is lame,” he said, “to put it simply.”

To seem more authentic, Calvin Klein is trying to reach consumers on their own turf by creating an online community, whatareyouin2.com, patterned after sites like MySpace and Facebook. The company has invited students at film schools around the country to submit shorts addressing the theme of “what are you into?” and their clips can be found on the site.

The response to CK in2u among fragrance retailers at trade shows was so strong, the company says, that it delayed its introduction by a month, to April 1, to increase production to close to two million units, nearly twice the initial volume of its Euphoria women’s fragrance in 2005.

The timing of the introduction may be fortunate, as statistics released last month by the NPD Group, the market research concern, indicate that the consumer appeal of celebrity fragrances, most of them targeted to millennials, has waned considerably. Sales of celebrity scents in department stores in the United States dropped last year by 17 percent to $140 million from 2005, despite a significant increase in the number of new celebrity scents. This drop, Calvin Klein executives believe, leaves room in the overall $2.8 billion prestige fragrance business for new ideas like CK in2u.

“We’ve been seeing a trend among younger consumers toward more fragrances from designer brands than from celebrities,” said Karen Grant, a senior beauty analyst for NPD Group. “The new millennial generation didn’t have a CK fragrance for them. So this really is a good opportunity to launch this.”

Ms. Gottlieb, the Calvin Klein nose, has an instinct for what sells. “If I know enough about the target audience, I can develop a scent for anyone,” she said. “The way I work is less about ingredients than the feelings they evoke.”

The fizzy, fruity flavor of CK One was an intentionally unexpected counterpoint to the prevailing gloomy image of the generation. CK in2u is more direct, she said, “spontaneous and seductive.”

The women’s scent includes notes of pink grapefruit, bergamot and red currant with a core of neon amber, the common denominator of all Calvin Klein scents. The men’s version of CK in2u is more beachy, with a salty mix of lime, cocoa and musk.

Because millennials are used to fast-moving information and images, Ms. Gottleib said, the fragrance is meant to be quick-acting and immediately recognizable on the skin. Their food and drinks, like Smartwater and coffee-flavored colas, and gum charged with flavor crystals, all come in high-definition, intensified varieties. So their fragrance should also seem busy.

“More than anyone, Americans smell with their eyes and their brains before they smell with their noses,” she said.

Ms. Park and her friend Mr. Klein do not discount entirely the likelihood of CK in2u becoming a blockbuster for their generation. Trends spread fast among their peers because they are so networked, accustomed to taking cues from what they see online. The Web can give anything — clothing, sneakers, fragrance — a viral aspect. But the Web can also leave anything open to ridicule, exposing marketing ploys, not to mention “technosexuals,” for what they really are.

source
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
[info]marci_ 8th-Mar-2007 06:01 pm (UTC)
WTF
[info]cire32 8th-Mar-2007 06:02 pm (UTC)
LMAO!

But why do you need CK if you're a shut-out?
[info]haverchuck_bill 8th-Mar-2007 06:51 pm (UTC)
I know right?
[info]iamdjkeoki 8th-Mar-2007 09:05 pm (UTC)
isn't it shut-in?
[info]beautyofbeing 8th-Mar-2007 06:02 pm (UTC)
Oh dear. Apparently we are a generation of idiots. =/
[info]vertigo_vox 8th-Mar-2007 06:02 pm (UTC)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA say what????

I don't get why people are obsessed with coming up with more and more "-sexual" labels....
[info]principino 8th-Mar-2007 06:03 pm (UTC)
tl; dr

OP, I'm in2u
[info]brenden 8th-Mar-2007 06:04 pm (UTC)
m4m y/y
[info]principino 8th-Mar-2007 06:06 pm (UTC)
y
[info]ourferocity 8th-Mar-2007 06:03 pm (UTC)
if it smells good, i buy it. i don't fall for this marketing crap.
[info]brenden 8th-Mar-2007 06:03 pm (UTC)
“I just imagine kids putting on cologne to sit behind their computers. That’s really weird.”


SPOT ON GURLFRIEND.
[info]serenity_winner 8th-Mar-2007 06:04 pm (UTC)
Hahaha, that's such bullshit.
[info]alistaere 8th-Mar-2007 06:04 pm (UTC)
This sounds really gay.
[info]_generalsmuts 8th-Mar-2007 06:25 pm (UTC)
people saying things are "gay" really bugs me.
[info]_generalsmuts 8th-Mar-2007 06:26 pm (UTC)
but yeah, it doesn't sound good.
[info]alistaere 8th-Mar-2007 06:44 pm (UTC)
Force of habit.
[info]disco_balla 8th-Mar-2007 06:05 pm (UTC)
LOL It's not completely far-fetched...

I was in a meeting at work yesterday and I SWEAR TO GOD I said "I agrree with that comment," to something one of my co-workers said. No one else seemed to get it but I was LOLing for like five minutes to myself.
[info]icequeen1502 8th-Mar-2007 06:16 pm (UTC)
hahahahaha i nearly say that all the time! i have to catch myself from saying "i agree with this comment" so much, it's kind of sad.
[info]astroik 8th-Mar-2007 06:47 pm (UTC)
lmfao nice

i find myself doing the whole "o rly" thing out loud... and nobody gets it but me... but i taught my four year old cousin to reply with "ya rly" and it makes me chuckle every time :']
[info]beaute__exquise 8th-Mar-2007 07:09 pm (UTC)
Is the girl in your icon real or has her body been photoshopped? That's really unfortunate.
[info]teenageriot16 8th-Mar-2007 08:22 pm (UTC)
I'm studying Pride & Prejudice at the moment. I took one look at the book and thought 'tl:dr' D:
[info]nerorizim 8th-Mar-2007 10:10 pm (UTC)
5 points if you actually said "LOL" out loud.
[info]xmas_n_hollis 8th-Mar-2007 11:24 pm (UTC)
I say "lol" ad nauseum (sp)
[info]jckrbbt 9th-Mar-2007 02:53 pm (UTC)
I do it all the time. I think it's more out of amusement for myself. I wish more people spoke that way, I think we'd all be ~in a better place~.
[info]teenageriot16 8th-Mar-2007 06:05 pm (UTC)
did anyone else read that as 'transexuals'?
[info]7here_she_goes 8th-Mar-2007 06:08 pm (UTC)
In deed, I did.
[info]haverchuck_bill 8th-Mar-2007 06:52 pm (UTC)
yes!
[info]zulkey 8th-Mar-2007 06:06 pm (UTC)
uh, calvin, you do know that the ppl you're marketing this to pretty much all look like this:

[info]bellipotens 8th-Mar-2007 07:33 pm (UTC)
"Worst perfume ever."
[info]zulkey 8th-Mar-2007 07:39 pm (UTC)
ha ha good one
[info]amo_el_verano 8th-Mar-2007 06:06 pm (UTC)
I had ck1 when I was a teen. I loved the way it smelled.
[info]raven_one 8th-Mar-2007 06:11 pm (UTC)
I spilled a whole bottle on my dresser once and it reeked for weeks, so now I associate it with me being a dumbass.
[info]_self__portrait 8th-Mar-2007 06:31 pm (UTC)
haha good anecdote.
[info]ornithologie 8th-Mar-2007 08:00 pm (UTC)
I had a bottle of it (admittedly only a little one) and my best friend dropped it on a tiled floor and it smashed. I was soooooo pissed.

The room smelled nice though. :/
[info]misscrystal 9th-Mar-2007 02:42 am (UTC)
Really? My mom has this thing for perfumes/colognes and she bought me CK1 once and I absolutely HATED it. And she expected me to wear it to school, too.
Granted, I was only 10 or so, but still.
If I were to smell CK1, I think it would bring back memories of fractions and pogs.
[info]glitter_my_glam 8th-Mar-2007 06:06 pm (UTC)
Oh Jesus Christ.
[info]raven_one 8th-Mar-2007 06:09 pm (UTC)
The word blog will never sound sexy, just like the word moist will always sound creepy & gross.
[info]raven_one 8th-Mar-2007 09:27 pm (UTC)
*gasp!* I never thought about fluid...you're so right!
[info]wanderingbelle 8th-Mar-2007 10:17 pm (UTC)
Thank you! Moist is on my list of all-time forbidden words.
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 3:06 pm GMT.