ONTD

7:21 pm - 02/28/2007

AP Entertainment Editor Institutes Ban on Paris Hilton Coverage

NEW YORK The Associated Press decided to give up a major vice last week: its addiction to stories about Paris Hilton. In the past year, Hilton has appeared on the wire an average of twice a week.

The wire service's entertainment editor Jesse Washington sent a memo to staffers on Feb. 13 that said, barring any major events, the AP would not run any mention of Paris Hilton on the wire, according to the memo, which was obtained by the New York Observer.

In the Observer article Washington was quoted as saying, "There was a surprising amount of hand-wringing. A lot of people in the newsroom were saying this was tampering with the news." Washington added that one editor's response was: "This is a great idea -- can we add North Korea?"

The AP was largely successful in the experiment, but Washington said that, unfortunately, her name did pop up in a couple of stories.


Source

I know one of the New York Daily News' "celebrity news" reporters did a similar ban a few years ago, and pretty much stuck to it.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
[info]yummymarsbars 1st-Mar-2007 03:35 am (UTC)
I'm definitely for that idea. She doesn't deserve her name in the papers.
[info]munchkin1616 1st-Mar-2007 04:03 am (UTC)
for sure
[info]mellowraspberry 1st-Mar-2007 03:35 am (UTC)
AWESOME!
[info]green__desire 1st-Mar-2007 03:37 am (UTC)
Wait so they WANT to see it all hang out?
[info]ellinorianne 1st-Mar-2007 03:37 am (UTC)
Oh, Thank GOD, this makes me have a little more faith in the press. I mean, US can report on her, but it was really sad to see so much of her on AP.
[info]fortunatefool__ 1st-Mar-2007 03:37 am (UTC)
can we do this for ONTD?
[info]dioratwar 1st-Mar-2007 03:38 am (UTC)
iawtc
[info]de_wood 1st-Mar-2007 03:40 am (UTC)
I agree. She rarely entertains me.
[info]wrapmeuptight 1st-Mar-2007 03:46 am (UTC)
seconded
[info]jiai1 1st-Mar-2007 03:59 am (UTC)
Also agreed/was going to say
[info]munchkin1616 1st-Mar-2007 04:03 am (UTC)
agreed
[info]nvmdthebllcks 1st-Mar-2007 04:15 am (UTC)
That would be brilliant.
[info]ultra_obscene84 1st-Mar-2007 06:05 am (UTC)
I agree. The bitch doesn't do ANYTHING. Except waste space.
[info]xdecadentx 1st-Mar-2007 07:04 am (UTC)
HAHA best idea EVER
[info]_glamazon 1st-Mar-2007 09:06 am (UTC)
rotfl... agreed!
[info]edie_finneran 1st-Mar-2007 10:50 am (UTC)
Yes, and if her name pops up in some article not directly about her it should be changed to "She-who-shall-not-be-named".
[info]sikodelika 1st-Mar-2007 04:35 pm (UTC)
LOL!

Love that.
[info]shewakesup 1st-Mar-2007 03:56 pm (UTC)
IAWTC x 3
[info]paradise_alley 2nd-Mar-2007 09:45 am (UTC)
i tried to post an item to ontd where someone else was trying to do a ban on her. in the post i said "oh, can we? can we?" in a humorous sort of way and one of our lovely mods rejected it, saying "that's dumb." o_O oookay then.
[info]alohayall 1st-Mar-2007 03:38 am (UTC)
Hahaha sigh this is like the AP version of sending someone to http://www.livejournal.com/accountstatus.bml
[info]teenagepolitics 1st-Mar-2007 03:39 am (UTC)
haha ftw!
[info]ryandxc 1st-Mar-2007 03:39 am (UTC)
That was nice of the AP to give up writing about whores for Lent!
[info]l0la 1st-Mar-2007 03:59 am (UTC)
Bahah. You ftw!
[info]lillyrayne 1st-Mar-2007 05:03 am (UTC)
when does lent start?!? can you tell I'm catholic?
[info]de_wood 1st-Mar-2007 03:39 am (UTC)
What if Paris Hilton tries to kill the president?
[info]darling_nikki_ 1st-Mar-2007 04:03 am (UTC)
I can't imagine George Bush fucking her.
[info]thadragonfly 1st-Mar-2007 07:49 am (UTC)
Biological warfare?
[info]misha_bsb 1st-Mar-2007 04:05 am (UTC)
If she succeeds AND goes to jail, it's win-win

/just kidding
//please don't wiretap my phones
[info]maniaclove 1st-Mar-2007 03:40 am (UTC)
A+
[info]trinity_squared DONT EVER BAN1st-Mar-2007 03:40 am (UTC)
Anna Nicole!

i beg you!
[info]taint3dhalo 1st-Mar-2007 03:42 am (UTC)
roflmao! BAN SET!
[info]armyofjulie 1st-Mar-2007 03:42 am (UTC)
gtfo of our newz bitch!
[info]american_lie 1st-Mar-2007 03:42 am (UTC)
i think she ran out of steam. i don't think people want to be interested in a person who does nothing. if she's making porn and using slurs and people are STILL bored than she should just pack it up and try to get a real job.
[info]baileysmama01 1st-Mar-2007 03:43 am (UTC)
Good!
[info]ghost_dance 1st-Mar-2007 03:44 am (UTC)
all i know is that this goes against all sorts of journalistic ethics
[info]watermeloncholy 1st-Mar-2007 03:52 am (UTC)
It's Paris Hilton though, I'm sure simply reporting on her is breaking some journalistic ethics right thurr.

I know what you mean but journalists manipulate shit all the time. Heh, journalism students ftw. I swear, after the first core journalism class, half the people no longer wanted to do journalism or public relations because of the ethical issues within journalism. So sad...
[info]theprinceof 1st-Mar-2007 04:12 am (UTC)
really, is there like a standard code, or is it more like, invisible rules?
[info]ghost_dance 1st-Mar-2007 02:44 pm (UTC)
yeah i'm not a journalist major, i'm advertising, but i take a lot of the same classes that the journalists have to take (like media ethics) and DAYUM journalists are held to some high standards.
[info]tube_fiend 1st-Mar-2007 04:14 am (UTC)
Not really. It says "barring any major events."

They're basically just letting their reporters and new outlets know that they no longer want to cover the minutia of this girl's trashy life.

They're not impeding the coverage of news. They're stopping the coverage of non-news.
[info]pandaklr 1st-Mar-2007 04:55 am (UTC)
i don't think she is relevant
[info]oddballkansan 1st-Mar-2007 05:11 am (UTC)
Well, I'd imagine with someone like that, it turns into a viscious cycle - you pay attention to them and make them newsworthy, and they manipulate it so their very existence becomes newsworthy. If she were to do something major and noteworthy, I'm sure that they would put it on there, but she never really does anything independent of acting dumb, being famous, and making comments about other people. If she were dropping an album, or opening a movie, or something, I'm sure they'd note that. But it seems like most of the things I see about her are along the lines of "Paris: Nicole knows what she did" or "Paris: Britney is out of control" or something like that. Which isn't so much doing something as commenting about something.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 3:05 pm GMT.